Video summary
In the first instance, Li Jiang was found to interfere with public affairs but was exempt from punishment, and after appeal the facts, evidence and law should be fully examined. The second instance first appeared today, but the court did not recognize that he was entrusted to Li as his friend's defense defender. Without a clear legal basis, the defense qualification review could be alienated to the substantive control of the mid-level courts in Shandong and the dean Zhu Hai ships over the right…

Article discussion
Verified members can discuss this report publicly and manage their own content.
Checking member sign-in status…