On August 24, 2026, a serious case involving the entire internet legal circle and the Internet industry was held in the people's court of the Guangdong province.
This is the controversial case of Hangzhou “Beautiful Friend” APP.
Unlike ordinary criminal cases, this case can be the year 2026 Internet justice benchmark case, legal controversy is very strong, industry impact is very deep, public opinion attention is very high.
Why did 4,9 million disputes evolve into 3,2 billion scary cases?
The source of the whole case is so simple that it is incredible.
A user in Hebei, in the case of dating APP for the broadcaster awarded 4.9 million yuan, because of the failure to obtain the woman's broadcaster contact, unhappy, alarm report.
Originally only ordinary consumer disputes, civil disputes, can be solved through mediation and consultation.
But the case was escalated, cross-provincial investigation, and thorough examination, and ultimately the public prosecution authority determined that:
The total amount of the case amounted to 3.2 billion yuan, and all 15 employees of the company were guilty.
From bosses, operations, finances, to programmers without decision-making rights, customer service, ordinary female broadcasters, all stand on the defendant's seat.
The biggest industry shocks are:
Grassroots employees who have worked regularly for years have been directly recognized as “illegal profits”.
This also makes this case the industry's largest controversial case: is the broadcast speech induction, platform marketing behavior, or criminal fraud? underlying workers normal wages, should they bear heavy criminal responsibility?
In addition, the case has typical cross-regional extraterritorial jurisdiction, remote ocean fishing, extraterritorial seizure and other disputes, which have been at the centre of the public opinion storm since the filing of the case in 2025.
The case first opened in November 2025, and was forced to suspend the trial for nine months due to incomplete evidence transfer and suspicion of key issues.
On August 24, 2026, the case was reopened under the eye of the public, and the defensive confrontation was unprecedentedly fierce.
B. Annual compliance with case numbers, paradoxical documents details absurd
Many internet users who do not understand justice will misunderstand the case in 2025 and the court in 2026, is it wrong?
Clearly stated: Complete compliance, no problems.
Judicial cases are based on the year of filing, cases are complex, long cycles, and annual trials are normal.
The genuine, absurd, unwashable hard wounds appeared in the court's official publication and several side hearings.
The publicly printed time of the hearing is:
Time of trial: 24 August 2026 – 18 September 2025
Direct translation: The trial has not yet begun, it has already ended last year.
A real-world trial, written by the court documents hard-lived as time reversal, time and space through.
This is not a draft, not a web-transmitted P chart, not a mass handwriting mistake.
This is an official judicial certificate covered by the court's red proclamation, officially effective for the outside world, and used for court trial access.
A small ticket to expose the triple justice mess.
If it is just a simple error, it can be understood.
But this side hearing is a typical counterpart of overlapping multiple errors and the complete process audit failure.
The timing is completely reversed, contrary to basic common sense.
The start time is later than the end time, belonging to the low-level logical mistake that neither elementary school students will commit. The whole school is unmanned, unmanned, uninterrupted, and the cover directly leaks out.
All key identity information in handwriting
Listener's name, ID number, no system printing, no electronic trace, all hand-filled.
Very easy to copy, very easy to manipulate, impossible to trace, impossible to archive and verify, seriously violating the standardization requirements of judicial documents.
Public regulations are extremely irregular
The court public regulations directly cover, hide the case number, the core text of the court session time.
Solemn judicial credentials, become arbitrary stamped, arbitrary covered wooden documents.
The most ironic scene: the word in the court is more true, and the grass in the court.
This trial is a landmark case of national attention and industry attention.
Above the court: to defend the two sides of fierce clashes, word and word consideration, the distinction of crime and non-crime, clarify the quality of hundreds of millions of funds, concerning the freedom and destiny of dozens of people.
Outside the courts: court-style documents are broken, common sense collapses, auditing is void, and style is scattered.
What an irony, what a shame.
The people do not understand the high penalty law, do not understand the crime of the unit, do not understand the disputes of jurisdiction. but the people understand the time reversal, understand the paperwork, understand the work inheritance.
Judicial credibility, never destroyed in the big case wrong judgment. The vast majority of the time, are destroyed in this unattractive, no one cares about "little omission".
V. Details are lost, confidence is inevitably lost
Procedural justice is the bottom line of justice and the face of justice.
A side hearing is the first window of ordinary people's access to justice and perception of justice.
Even the simplest date logic is not rigorously verified, even the most basic document norms are not implemented, and even the most basic work prudence is completely lacking.
The public will inevitably raise a reasonable question: can even paper notes be mistaken, can volumes of materials, evidence review, funding determination, trial process, really be strict and fair?
Every public decree, every document, every date represents the solemnity and majesty of public authority.
Do not let the big case of the world's attention end up losing to an absurd side hearing.
Only by facing the negligence, recriminating the gaps, correcting the process, and strictly correcting, can we truly keep the bottom line of the procedure, safeguard the dignity of justice, and safeguard fairness and justice in the hearts of the people.
Special description: On August 24, 2026, the trial on the same day, please see the tweet released by the public number "tracking the moon and the stars of friends": Hangzhou "American friend" was accused of borrowing the host of the broadcast fraud case of 3.2 million, the case, the case was completed one day, the case was registered 14 civilian police jointly signed to create Guangdong "End州 speed".
(The full text is finished)
The original information *
Original title: 3.2 billion cases of public attention, a "backflow of time and space" side hearing, tear down the background of grassroots justice
Source: WeChat Public No. “Hu Old Lion WOA”
Article discussion
Verified members can discuss this report publicly and manage their own content.
Checking member sign-in status…