Hebei court suspected of fake sentences, reduced sentences for more than 16 years, relevant persons have not been prosecuted

More than a decade ago, in a criminal case tried by the people's court of the Taoyuan Municipality in Hebei Province, the case was suspected of violating several major legal procedures, suspected of being collectively counterfeited by several judges by abusing the name of Wang Qing Liang, and made a multi-fake reduction of the sentence for the criminal gang that had already been sentenced to death, which has reduced the sentence for more than 16 years for several criminals.

At the end of 2017, the "named reduction of punishment" of the district court in the east window occurred. after being informed of the life of the king, the main method of the case, the official Wang Qing Liang was informed and charged with the relevant departments, the establishment of the special team of the district committee in 2023 was true, the situation of the district committee's inspection investigation was true, and the relevant personnel of the district court to the accuser Wang Qing Liang's return also confirmed the situation was true.

“H, from 2023, to the end of 2025, the court to report to the upper department, during which time, the court not only failed to prosecute the collective counterfeiters, but on the contrary, the court also in this report, continued to falsify the opinions signed by himself in the case, to know the case, refused to participate in the case and deliberately over-examination, refused to transfer the case, and to continue to deceive organizations such as forging the signature of himself, in order to further cover up the collective counterfeiting of several members of the court and committee members to avoid responsibility,” Wang Jin Liang said.

1, Wang Qing Liang hosted the appeal review case, formed the review conclusion, was unanimously adopted after discussion by the first review committee.

In 2011, the court tried a gang of joint theft and destruction cases, case number (2011) the first word of the court sentence No. 5, in which one of the defendants Zhang某仁, was sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 12 years.

Since then, until April 2014, several deanors, deputy deanors of the district court, and deanors of the district court have internally formed a decision to maintain the original judgment, and not to be re-examined. In the meantime, the house also made (January 25,

1. the No. 2 "Rejection of the complaint notification", whichined the original judgment on the case of Zhang Jin.

The informed said that in August 2013, the chief executive of the district court, An Mouyang, was determined to initiate a review of the complaint of the case of Zhang Jin, and that the former deputy chief executive, Wang Mou, would be relocated, while the chief executive of the court was relocated due to the cause.

In October 2013, Wang Qing Liang, 50 years old, has been involved in the trial for 27 years, and has served as the chairman of the trial supervision court for 14 years.

Wang Jin Liang said that six months after his appointment as head of the criminal court, the court filed a new case against Zhang Jin's complaint, the case numbered as (2013) court imprisonment number 1.

On April 3, 2014, the court held the first review committee on Zhang Yin's appeal case.At the meeting, Liu Yin, Huang Yin, Li Yin and other members of the review committee in charge of the court's leadership positions proposed to re-examinate several criminals of Zhang Yin's theft group.Examination judge Wang Qing Liang, citing the provisions of the law, judgment practices and other rules put forward, the case only Zhang Yin's appeal, should observe the principle of non-examination, and who applies, trial whom, safeguarding the effective judgment and the principle of correcting errors in accordance with law, this re-examination should only be against Zhang Yin.

The proposal, drawn from the conclusions of the review, was unanimously approved by the members of the meeting and signed, forming a unanimous decision to discuss the case only for a re-examination of Zhang Yin.

The main method of the official Wang Qing Liang is unaware, the court's several judges collectively pronounced, collectively reduced the punishment for the criminal gang of Zhang Jin.

In accordance with the decision of re-examination, the case was filed by Zhang Yin, the case was named (2014) the first word of the court sentence. After the case was filed, because the prison of Zhang Yin and other criminals did not have access to the online public trial hardware conditions, it was necessary to wait for the prison court to finish, equipped and fully equipped, and at the same time more than 10 police forces, to meet the need for court trial.

The court record showed that the case was commissioned by a lawyer and a friend to appear in court. In the final page of the court record, Wang Qing Liang wrote "Judge Wang Qing Liang has read", and Zhang Jin commissioned a lawyer and friend to write the word "Hiang Qing Friends, 2015.4.9", Zhang Qing Liang and other four offenders were in the court record, and the signature was confirmed.

The thing that Wang Qing Liang did not think of was that after the trial, then-Chairman An Mou Qing proposed to reduce the punishment of several criminals in this case. Wang Qing Liang replied, "Then let us go to the Chinese Chamber to communicate and learn."

Wang Jinping said that in accordance with the provisions of the review of criminal appeals and criminal re-trial cases, after the review of the case, was discussed by the trial committee on April 3, 2014 and made a decision: only to Zhang Yin one for re-trial. after the re-trial trial, Xi Jinping again proposed beyond the scope of this trial, the reduction of the sentence for all criminal judges, which is to completely overturn, deny the results of the first trial committee collective discussion on April 3, 2014, to reverse the cases that have been completed trial, clearly contrary to the law.

Following this conversation, Wang was dispatched from the court at 17 a.m. on August 19, 2015.

A day later, on August 21, 2015, at 8 o’clock in the morning, in order to settle the volumes to be handed over, Wang Qing Liang arrived at the court early on the same day to work. The result was that, in the absence of all work handed over, the door lock of the court office was pushed, the door opened, Wang Qing Liang’s office computer was thrown in the office door, then office director Zhao Mou, as the successor, sat in front of the court’s desk, and told Wang Qing Liang to go to some Zhang Jin re-trial all seven volumes. Zhao Mou confirmed the signature on the receipt of the seven volumes.

After receiving the volume, Zhao Mou immediately intervened in the re-trial case of Zhao Mou reducing the sentence.

Wang Jin Liang said that in order to arrange Zhao Mou to relocate the three judges positions, including Wang Jin Liang, the court's practice was once criticized by the county people's and county committee organizing departments.

Wang Qing Liang said that in the falsification of the memorandum of agreement of the Chamber of Representatives and the second examination committee discussed the case, as well as before the verdict, they held a large number of times after the material of the case let me immediately sign, I said the material to be personally consulted, the result was taken back by Zhao and others on the spot, the fact is that the follow-up of the agreement of the court of re-examination, the examination committee discussion and the original signing of the judgment decision such as major procedures, myself as a member of the examination committee, the chairman of the court, the chief judge of the case and the organizer of the case did not know, naturally did not dare to sign.

Later, Wang Qing Ling learned that the judge's name was his own in the verdict, and more surprisingly Wang Qing Ling was surprised that Zhang Yin's re-trial reduction case, not only reduced the prison sentence of 12 years to 6 years for Zhang Yin, but also the main perpetrators of the gang, the frequent perpetrators of the case, and many others, a total of more than 16 years.

Through adhering to principles and regulations, Wang Qing Liang was expelled, the outcome of the verdict was arbitrarily altered in accordance with the law, and even led to the catastrophe of prison.

"According to the provisions, I am the judge and chief method officer of Zhang Jin case, the council council agreement should be convened by me in accordance with the law, the convening of the judgment committee should be submitted by the judge, the verdict must also be confirmed by me first, then submitted to the judge or the deputy director of the branch to sign, and then can be printed; but in this case, because of the principle, according to the law, the case has not been cooperated with Zhang Jin, Zhao Mou, Liu Mou, Huan Mou Zhe and Liu Mou, they are regarded as alien for the extortion strike," Wang Qing Liu said, "they violated a number of legal procedures, made this re-trial decision, is

Because Wang Jinling did not cooperate with the counterfeiting, he was dispatched from the court, and in November 2015, he took office as the head of the people's court. In the subsequent work, Wang Jinling was also accused of interfering in the case hosted by Wang Jinling's trial andined by the entire court.

"On July 24, 2017, about 12 o'clock in the evening, the late Cancer Ann Mouyang in the workgroupined the case against the whole case of the Chinese Chamber of Commerce, personally insulted and initiated criticism of me, publicly in the Chinese Chamber of Commerce, the Chinese Chamber of Commerce and the WeChat Workgroup, issued a number of small text blasphemy accusations, and in the WeChatgroup announced the dismissal of the office of the Chief Justice of the people's court, and deprived my membership judge of the right to handle the case," Wang Jin Liang said.

Following the complaint of Wang Qing Liang, the Hebei Provincial High Court and the Qing City Central Court, in accordance with the law, restored Wang Qing Liang's qualification for handling the case, and corrected the absurd behavior of Wang Qing Liang's dismissal from the position of Wang Qing Liang member judge.

But since then, Wang Jinlin's normal judgment work has not been carried out normally.

In June 2017, in the case of Wang Qing Liang’s first civil loan number 560, which was hosted by Wang Qing Liang’s (2017) trial, Deputy Deputy Dean Wang Qingxian went on to work. After the trial, the judge agreed to form a unanimous opinion, all members signed and confirmed that according to the conclusions of the trial the draft judgment was drafted and signed by Wang Qing Liang, only to be delivered with a seal and the case was closed. But it was unexpected that when the case was filed, Wang Qing Liang’s judgment was completely deviated from Wang Qing Liang’s and the trial court’s conclusions, and the draft judgment was promptly corrected.

It is worth mentioning that the staff archives of the district court were all fake, and the "fake judge" of the university was named Cao Jung Liang (it is necessary to explain that the fake judge Cao Jung Liang was named for his academic qualifications and studies, and the case was in June 2022, after being verified by the Hubei Provincial Commission Inspection Group, and ordered to cancel the publication), on November 29, 2017, in a civil loan dispute case, he drafted the print, and personally falsified Li Huang Huang Liang's name, the case was filed, the case was concluded on the same day, and the case of Hubei 0433 Financial Insurance No. 154 was enclosed, and the victim was charged with the provincial inspection group.

Wang Jinling also mentioned a criminal case handled by himself after the year 2014, when the deputy dean Liu Hai found Wang Qing Liang asking him to suspend the sentence of the first and second defendants. Because of the amount involved, Wang Qing Liang said that if the first and second defendants suspended the sentence, the three and four defendants should also be sentenced to suspend, because of the amount of the case, the impact is large, the four people sentenced to suspend the sentence, he has no right to decide, nor has a precedent. Liu Qing Liang said that the case has a senior leadership to say hello, Wang Qing Liang can do according to the above instructions. In order to let Wang Qing Liang "confident," also to Wang Qing Liang issued a greeting "word", to indicate "forgotten."

"Because of Yang Yongzhi, Han Yongzhi, the "fake judge" Gao Yong Li and others for a long time created a counterfeit case, and did not pay any cost, thereby driving the court's counterfeit case to the wind, he himself was expelled and struck by not wanting to join the flow," Wang Jin Liang said.

At the beginning of December 2017, the Hubei Provincial Commission inspection team was stationed in Zhou Tao. During the period, the official of the Zhou Tao county organ, Wang Qing Liang was unknown, for justice, on December 18, 2017, to the inspection group on several issues such as suspected bribes, superstitious activities, false bidding, Zhang Qing Liang's re-trial case, Wang Qing Liang was "pronounced to be reduced to punishment", a real-name report was made.

Shortly thereafter, the provincial committee inspection team transferred the material to the district district disciplinary committee to verify, and explicitly requested that the results of the inspection be to the provincial committee inspection in June of that year, while giving feedback to the reporting person.

On June 11, 2018, the late cancer, long-term unemployed An Moshing chairman held a court party group expansion meeting. The meeting decided to establish a three-party group, listed seven major issues, eight aspects of comprehensive investigation. This move, after being rejected by the three group chairman and nine members in total, An Moshing eventually formed only a single person from the personnel archives all fake, named An Moshing to the school, and directly belonged to the "executive office" led by An Moshing, special responsibility for investigating the cases conducted by Wang Moshing. In order to make the case surface regulations, also pulled into Zhang as a "executive office" member.

It should be pointed out that the conduct of Wang Qingling's investigation by An Yongzhou is the decision to "expand the Party Group Meeting of the Yongzhou County Court" and appears in the case of Wang Qingling.But this so-called "decision" was found to have not existed in the investigation group that later formed the "Wang Qingling Case Special Committee" of the Yongzhou County Commission, and it is said that the sub-party group expansion meeting has not been held.

Even so, under the specific operations of An Mouyang command, Gao Jung Liang, Wang Qing Liang, in accordance with the court of the chamber, allowed the House of Representatives to use the personal account for the temporary storage of case funds "practices" and norms, used his personal salary account for the temporary storage of case fines, guarantees and compensation, and completion of the court penalty collection tasks, and completion of the court case assessment of the mediation rate, automatic performance rate, compensation to the rate of compensation, was made a bribery, abuse of public funds crime, and in September 2021, after Wang Qing Liang retired for three years, was prosecuted by the Hebei Province Municipal Recovery District Prosecutor's Office on suspicion of bribery 90,000, over 70

# 4, Zhang Jin re-trial case, municipal council two-level party committee inspection, special team investigation team to verify the trial link of multiple fake

In April 2022, Wang Qing Liang, who was released from prison, with his 33-year experience and intuition in the trial work, began a multi-party investigation to collect evidence, and appealed to the relevant departments to defend the rights.

Wang Jin Liang said that the case of Zhang Yin's one complaint and multiple reductions in the "fake name reduction of punishment" re-trial, is the source of the wrong case and the whole incident.

Judicial evidence materials show that in the penalty reduction materials and the verdict in the case of Zhang Jin, after Wang Jin Liang's name was abused, Zhang Jin's 12-year sentence was cut off by half, and in the case's joint court record, the second trial committee record and the verdict appeared on the original, many manipulations, bets, false Wang Jin Liang's signature content.

From the series of counterfeiting issues, Wang Jin Liang first reflected the relevant situation in the case of the provincial municipal commission inspection, inspection group and the disciplinary commission supervision committee, the Yuan Senate and the secretary of the district committee.

From 7 to September 2023, the "Wang Qing Liang Case Special Panel" established by the Chinese municipality and county committee conducted an investigation into the matters it reflected, confirming that the "named reduction of punishment" issue in the re-trial case of Zhang Qing Jin was true.

On January 10th to 11th, 2024, the inspection team of the Zhou Municipal Committee, which was stationed in Zhou, verified the question of Wang Jin Ling's reflection, and replied with the phone to inform: confirmed that Zhou Jin's re-trial case was "named to be reduced."

At 17:20 on November 11, 2024, the court arranged for a court arrangement to call King Kim Lin to answer. The recording of the call lasted up to 9 minutes and 39 seconds showed that Wang Kim Lin falsely recorded the court record in the case of Zhang Jin re-examination, the record of the judgment committee on October 29, 2015 was all falsified, and the original judgment was not signed, Wang Kim Lin did not participate in the court and the judgment committee discussions, and the content was confirmed; Zhang Qing also acknowledged that he was cancelled academic qualification, academic status and still worked in the court's archive room "Fake Judge" Cao Ling, did not dare to manipulate the Zhang Jin case volume archive; at the same time, the so-called party group expansion meeting

Chen responded to the above contents of Wang Jin Lin's call to confirm the true existence of many false details in the case.

First, shortly after the trial on April 9, 2015, the case was transferred to Zhao Mou, but in the subsequent record of the Chamber of Representatives, the first review committee (convened on April 3,

1. decided to apply for a re-trial of Zhao Mou and directly overturn the change to reduce the punishment of several members of the criminal gang in the case.

Second, in the case, the second review committee resolution record of October 29, 2015 showed that there was no convener, no conference host, no reporting, no meeting recording, no synchronous video recording, was accused of comprehensive counterfeiting; the content also showed that the case from the original Zhang Yin one complaint, turned to a reduction of punishment for the gang of several criminals; among them, Zhang Yin the original trial decrease the term of imprisonment 12 years to 6 years and 1 month, Zhang Yin from the term of imprisonment 11 years to 5 years and 3 months, Zhou Yin from the term of imprisonment 14 years and 6 months to 13 years, the gang of many criminals have been reduced more than 16 years.

Third, Zhang Yin re-trial judge and Chief Measures Judge Wang Qing Ling, did not participate in the joint council deliberation, did not participate in the review committee discussion, did not receive any notification, did not know, did not sign; but (2014) the judge's signature of the judge's first sentence No. 1 was "Wang Qing Ling", "named reduction of punishment" is therefore true.

Fourth, the second examination committee recorded that behind the three words of "Wang Qing Liang" in the print, there was a handwritten word of nine words with the inscription "Have been dispatched from the court, refused to sign."

In this signature, Wang Qing Liang stated that the wording was not written by himself, and was counterfeit; but Zhao's written material was lied to be written by Wang Qing Liang, Wang Qing Liang questioned Zhao's wording and writing habits; Zhao said that the case was written by another member of the council, Liu Qing, but Liu Qing denied.

Wang Qing Liang and Zhao Mou on November 18, 2025, asked for the authentication of the sign and was borne by Zhao Mou for all costs, Zhao Mou promised to pay fees and authentication, but so far no action, refused to make the authentication of the sign and sign.

Fifth, (2014) the court sentence again the first word No. 1 was false, there are many known and confused.

Wang Jin Liang said, "Many people know that I am the judge chief and chief method officer, did not sign in the court note, did not sign in the judge board note, did not sign on the original judgment based on the sealed seal; know (2013) the 1st case volume of the penalty inspector exists, that is, Liu, Zhao, Zhao, Han, Zhejiang, Li and others know that the 1st trial committee decided to re-examinate only one person, clearly know that the signature on the second trial committee note will be overturned, completely deny the 1st trial committee decision, especially the earliest receipt of all volumes, successor Zhao, Zhao, Zhao, Zhao, Zhao and self-confirmation of the supervisory

Sixth, in a case in which Wang Moshing a false reduction of the sentence, the Chinese court judge's document network failed to find out that Zhang Moshing was reduced the sentence of the judge, but found that Zhang Moshing was once again using the false reduction of the sentence, and Zhang Moshing will serve the prison sentence with a presumptive release of the criminal ruling, once again demonstrating the false reduction of the sentence's true existence, there is Zhang Moshing (2016) expecting the sentence of 0433 and the ruling of 207 as evidence.

5, covering up the facts of the case for false, the court has provided false information for a long time to blur upper verification

The existing evidence in the case shows that in the re-trial case of Zhang Yin and related matters, the district court of Zhong Yin County, since the then dean An Yin Qing, then deputy dean Liu Yin Hai, Han Yin Ji, Li Yin Ming, and then judge Liu Yin Qing, Zhang Yin Kai, false judge Gao Yong Liang, and many others, suspected of having different degrees of involvement in counterfeiting or providing false information to relevant departments.

It should be noted that after the facts of collective sexual involvement in the case were verified by the municipal commission inspection and joint county committee special team, in order to cover up the alleged facts, the chamber was repeatedly "modified" and broken, on November 17, 2025, to the relevant departments made a "Report on the handling of Wang Qing Liang's letter visit affairs", and suspected to continue to falsify the verification of the superior.

Wang Jin Liang said that in the report, he was deprived of judicial authority and was disguised as "Wang Qing Liang opened the trial on April 9, 2015 under the circumstances of knowingly over-the-counter trial", while the fact is that the case was postponed due to the detention of Zhang Yin's prison does not have the conditions for the trial.

In the report, Wang Jinlin moved from the court, Zhao Mou took over, during the check, Zhao Mou explained the situation: some cases have been handled in the earlier period, the volume has not been transferred, after the case has exceeded the examination limit, after the coordination of the then-executive deputy dean Liu Mou, the criminal volume has been transferred.

Wang Jin Liang said that Liu Hai was one of the core persons who figured himself to be transferred from the court after not handing over the issue in a timely manner.

In fact, a receipt provided by Wang Kim Lin showed that all the materials of the Zhang Yin re-examination case, already on August 21, 2015, that is, the next day Wang Kim Lin was displaced, were transferred to Zhao.

In fact, the "Report on the Handling of Wang Qing Lian's Letter Visit Matters" prepared by the district court was only handed over to Wang Qing Lian by the district council until November 2025.

Wang Qing Liang carefully read the report after stating that the above-mentioned relevant persons of the court, in the case of Zhang Jin re-examination, fake facts clear, the evidence is firm, the relevant departments are relentless of the court collective corruption and wrongdoing, let the previous dean ignore the supervision and inspection of the People's Congress, inspection and rectification requirements, ignore the regulations of the party disciplinary punishment, the judge law and the judge committee rules, the council rules, not only did not verify the case, but tolerated the court, continued to fire false facts and false reports on Wang Qing Liang's accusation of the fall, Wang Qing Liang wrongdoing and misleading the superior department, its behavior of the bad nature

Wang Jinping said that he will continue to declare to the Central Committee, the National People's Congress, the Central Commission for Discipline, the Central Committee for Political and Legal Affairs, the Central Committee for Political and Legal Affairs, and the relevant departments of the respective provinces and cities until the day when the truth will come to light, the water will come out and the snow will come to light.

Zhang Xiaoyu, former reporter of the Chinese Industrial and Commercial Times and head of Guangdong Reporter Station, is now the executive vice president and general editor of the Macao Global News.