Two-sale buys were suspended after 150,000 users arrived: why a small program is tingling Chinese workers' right to rest and rest?

Over 150,000 registered users, figures published by the “two-stop” team on 9 September. After one day, this one makes the enterprise a searchable information small program > > >. The platform page shows that it is alleged to be in violation of the requirements of the Mobile Internet Application Information Services Management (IMIMS) Regulations. A private tool that helped job seekers identify the “two-stop company” suddenly stopped after it went so fast that the issue of the right to rest, which was long-standing but not transparent, was brought back to the surface.

Red, then off: 48 hours of hard turns

"As far as the "Ah-href" is concerned,https://www.cb.com.cn/index/show/bzyc/cv/cv1353661277"target" = "blank" rel = "noopener noreferrer" data-linked-reference = "true" data-reference-label = "China Business News" > , run by a team of young developers, can be submitted by users with information on business rest, working hours, overtime and entitlements and support the implementation of double-entry through consumer links Hugh's business. Team 9 September said that registered users had already broken 150,000. On 10 September, the minor procedure subsequently showed that service was suspended.

The > Team responded publicly that the Platform needed to complete the relevant verification, which would be aligned with the modifications and call for rational discussion among users.

The relevant account number was subsequently renamed “Landless cattle” and the content of “rest off” was published. The change is taking place very quickly: from user growth, public discussion to platform suspension, which is concentrated on almost a few days.

It is not a commodity, but information on the working conditions of the enterprise.

The most important function of the “dual buy-out” is not to direct the general electrician, but to bring together highly dispersed information in the real world of work: whether a company is on double break, how long it actually works, whether it works frequently, and what is the treatment. This information was often to be known only after entry into the workforce, and the Platform tried to move it forward to the job search and consumption options.

This explains why it quickly acquires users. For many workers, the two-term break is not an abstract benefit, but one of the lowest cost indicators for the working conditions of a company. When a large number of users volunteer to submit their business work systems, the Platform has in fact developed a database of corporate evaluations from the workers ' side.

The public material shows that user discussions also extend to consumption initiatives such as “purchase of double-suspension enterprise products only”. In other words, labour conditions are beginning to be linked to consumption choices: whether enterprises guarantee rest time is no longer a matter of internal management, but may be a criterion for external consumers to evaluate their enterprises.

Suspended on the basis of the “information services management” written, but which is the violation?

The applet pause page quotes . To date, however, the public page does not adequately indicate which particular content, which user information or which operational mechanism triggers the suspension.

That is exactly what the events need to continue to ask. Where the platform involves users issuing business evaluations, it will certainly need to address issues such as false information, malicious attacks and personal information protection; But it should also indicate the facts of the specific violations and the modification of the border. If only one statute name is published without explaining what the Platform did wrong, it is difficult for developers and 150,000 users to know what labour information sharing is allowed.

At a minimum, the following are to be further publicized:

• Which authority took the decision to suspend services;
• the specific breach of which of the obligations in the regulatory provisions;
• The question is whether it is a filing, content management, personal data protection or other;
• What kind of modifications can be completed to restore services;
• How the data on the working conditions of enterprises submitted by the user will be processed.

A small program revealed a chronic lack of transparency in labour information

Even if the “dual rest and recuperation” were to be restored, the problems of overtime, invisible overtime and the lack of transparency of the rest system could not be addressed alone. But its sudden loss at least proves one thing: a large number of workers wish to know the real working hours of a business before they find out before they can find out before they can sign a contract and get to work, and then find out that the so-called “twilight break” is only the text on the job page.

China believes that what really deserves a public governance response is not just a small process to complete the Platform's compliance process, but why 150,000 users gather on a “two-term” inquiry tool in such a short time. When workers rely on crowd-sourcing databases to determine whether a company actually gives their employees weekend breaks, the problem itself goes beyond Internet product regulation.

It should be followed by a continuous review of the possibility of restoring the “dual buys” reorganization, whether the regulatory authority has made the specific treatment basis public and whether a similar enterprise's time-use database will continue to appear. Whether or not the product is ultimately viable, the worker requires the right to know “how long it will take to work after entering the workforce” and does not disappear as a small procedure is suspended.