Anhui civilian police misconduct: where is justice?

Too many words have been painted to sing the police at the front, and we are always conscious that those who are fighting for the safety of the people will be treated fairly.

The incident of Kang Jia Hong, Deputy Director of the Police Station of Angry and Fatenhara, was only a matter of deep-seated concern. If you are also a daily, business-oriented, grass-roots person, you can read this stabbing experience.

He is not a emptied head of office, but a hard-core, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-run, front-line, front-run, front-run, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-run-run, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-run, front-line, front-line, front-line, front-stop, front-stop, front-stop, front The search for fugitives was accompanied by broken legs, broken legs and permanent disability, and the long walk was not sustained even by standing and long trials. This certificate of disability, which was bought with flesh and blood, was supposed to be the medal of the crowd, which in turn became a soft spot for anyone to be held hostage and forced to bear all the blame for his crimes.

The whole thing started with a clear domestic injury dispute. The fact that the father hired a person to injure his own son was clear and simple, and that the characterization of ordinary intentional injury was sufficient under the law.

In an attempt to draw the light of the test, the police station, which was working on the issue, had to set aside the facts of the case and to make it a crime to fight against corruption. When the law is set to give way to digital performance, the case is destined to breed irreparable error from the moment it is distorted and characterized.

In accordance with the rules governing the internal duties of public security, cases of mobs and fights are attributed to the criminal police force, and the police station at the grass-roots level had no investigative powers. Everyone knows that this is a hot, easily lost, hot potato, and it is too easy to avoid. The leader, knowing that Hong Jia was seriously injured and that he could not handle the case with great intensity, imposed on him an administrative order that placed the burden on him not on the police station, but on the disabled civilian police.

Professionals and honest people who work do not know how to push, follow organizational arrangements and take over with injuries, and the lead in the case is never in his hands. How many grass-roots people have had such a weakness: no one wants to touch a difficult job, and in the end they will only be put to the man who listens and does not push.

The civilian police officers who are responsible for the entire follow-up of the interrogation, the taking of evidence and the identification process are Chen Zheng-tai, who handles all interrogations, the evidence is fixed and the persons involved are apprehended. The case file and the complete surveillance video footage of the crime area are all supporting evidence that Chen Xiaotai's efforts to induce the client to make statements at the time of the interrogation, that the identification link was led by intervention, that he was induced to confess during the interrogation of several suspects, that he was reprimanded with corporal punishment, and that even violent testimony was given to the suspect, directly causing injuries to the wrist of the other. All the evidence clearly points to Chen Shui. Under the system of lifelong recourse for wrongful cases, those responsible for the direct commission of the offence, the taking of evidence and the wrongful detention of the case, should bear full responsibility for the core responsibility.

But the reality is so different, it is cruel and obscurantistic.

An invisible barrier of power holds those responsible for their actions in the same place as those responsible. In conducting their investigations, the officers of the Hoi-Fu Municipal Public Prosecutor ' s Office deliberately and selectively gathered all testimony against Kang Jia-Hung, all of whom were deliberately put on hold and were not verified, and who were able to reciprocate the truth, monitor the serious violations committed by Chen Shui-tai, medical reports, key witnesses.

The final outcome of the accountability was completely reversed. Concubine Hong was accused of torture to extract confessions and sentenced to imprisonment for not having been able to do so for being disabled and having only used a means of restraint in the hands of the suspect, without causing any physical injury throughout the course.

The suspects who have committed a wrongful act and committed a number of serious violations have not been punished, and no record of accountability has been recorded on them, and promotions have followed, typically “with medical promotions”.

The word " responsibility " is light and has little weight in the face of human nature and context. How can we not be in the business and the system? Those who do wrong have safe and secure land and are honest and do good work, but pay for the wrong of others.

If the injustice of the entity ' s conviction is already a source of outrage, the flagrant violation of procedural justice at the trial scene is a direct blow to the expectations of ordinary people for justice.

In 2021, when the court of the Shang Gang District Court opened its hearing, Kang Jia Hong was able to make a clear and complete statement of the defence of three counts of innocence, and the simultaneous recording of the entire court hearing was completely sealed, which is objective and not capable of tampering with. But when the trial transcript was in his hands, all the arguments disappeared and the paper record appeared to be as if he had confessed in silence throughout the process.

In 2021, when the court of the Shang Gang District Court opened its hearing, Kang Jia Hong was able to make a clear and complete statement of the defence of three counts of innocence, and the simultaneous recording of the entire court hearing was completely sealed, which is objective and not capable of tampering with. But when the trial transcript was in his hands, all the arguments disappeared and the paper record appeared to be his silent acquiescence throughout the process.

On the day of delivery of the judgement, the clerk arrived at the prison and privately requested Kang Jia-Hung to write his own defence, in an attempt to forge a false impression of his consent to the statement, his voluntary confession of guilt and his claim that the defence statement was erased and the transcript was altered, all of which was arranged by the presiding judge.

The deliberate denial of the right to a legal defence and the falsification of written material for the hearing are clear and explicit violations of the law. The whole body of evidence, such as a complete video, a file, a medical examination, was repeatedly caught in the trap of a procedure when Kang Jia-Huan submitted complaints and reports from the grass-roots level to the Central Commission on Political and Judicial Law.

The transfer of material layers back to the original unit of investigation is tantamount to allowing the reported person to self-examine his or her problems, obstructing the way to correct errors and delaying the correction of the wrong-doing facts. Where should any ordinary person seek to rely when the complaint can only be turned around and any injustice is encountered?

This is a painful event that never stops the person, but the tens of thousands of ordinary people who are rooted in the ground and are committed to the task.

There are too many rules of the system that are well known: when there is honour, when there is merit, when all fight for the same; When jobs go wrong, undrilled, undivided, and undivided cadres at the grass-roots level are always the first to be pushed out to the bottom.

It is undeniable that the supervisory leadership does have a duty to monitor the work of the team and to handle cases, but that responsibility at this level of supervision must not be directly equated with the criminal responsibility of the front-line person for the violation of the law.

In order to achieve the test, the first-line staff acted in a manner that was arbitrary and incriminating, and ultimately all the consequences were placed on the civilian police, who were disempowered and disempowered, in order to complete the test.

Over time, grass-roots teams have only been able to breed chilling effects. If you are at the grass-roots level, you will surely experience the cold: a heavy burden causes the burning of your body, and leads to the journey of those who lie flat and know how to climb.

Who else would be willing to take on the risk and difficulty of taking on the troublesome case? Who else would be willing to do the job orders from their superiors? (b) The attack on the wounded and the guard population, which ended up in jail for wrongs; The people who have fled and are backed by people are safe and safe. The hard-working people have chosen to lie down in a cold, peaceful manner, and the law enforcement forces at the grass-roots level have slowly lost those who are willing to take up the role and dare to do so.

Judicial fairness never makes sense of the distinction between identity and context. This fairness is to safeguard the interests of ordinary people and, more importantly, to be kind to every law enforcer who has stood up and bled and wounded.

He has been a police officer for half his life, has been a suspect with permanent disability, has been following his/her own organization and has not been partially self-involved. A distorted performance appraisal, artificial power bias, and deliberately altered court proceedings, led to the imposition of a civil war hero on a situation of injustice. After the bloodshed, it is necessary to swallow the untold suffering and the mental suffering of the individual.

He now submits his own report, re-examines his application and petitions to the higher political and judicial authorities. He wants to keep his own people clean, and to tear up the pits of the grass-roots, which are not subject to any authority or responsibility, and to speak out for all those who work at the grass-roots level, who are working in bad conditions.

Numerous people expect the oversight services to be able to face up to all the suspicions in the case, to access the entire files and audio and video recordings of the hearings of the year in full, to hand over to the off-site for independent verification, and to completely exclude local human and power interference; The law establishes the procedure for re-examination, clarifies the true division of responsibility in the case and quashs the wrong sentence.

(b) To thoroughly investigate and rewrite the trial transcript, to select cases, to favour the protected prosecutor and the judge, and to hold him accountable for his ultimatum in accordance with the rules; Reactivate a comprehensive investigation into the problems of the Chen Jin-Tai violations and the promotion of the disease, clarify the clear border between the responsibility for management oversight and the direct criminal error, and no longer allow the cadres to be the ones who cover up all the problems.

Today's injustice is being done by a civilian police officer who protects us, helpless tomorrow, who may be any ordinary person who works hard and who knows nothing about the relationship. Fair justice has never been linked to each of us.

One more person sees this frustration, and one more force to push the truth to the ground. May the light of the rule of law shine on everyone equally, irrespective of the level of the post or the background of the past. No ordinary person who lives in earnest and does his or her duty should be a scapegoat for the times.

This paper only provides an objective summary of the facts and documentary evidence of the case, objectively recording the claims of the parties, all of which are taken from public sources such as the judgement in force.

The original information

Original title: The case of Anhui Kang Jia Hong: The police emblem is scarred and the heart is cold: a disabled civilian police officer was the only victim of the mistake.

Source: Micro-Credit Public #Practice