Jiangxi visited Min Yuh Fong to reveal the early morning departure of Beijing House: the mobile phone was checked and handed over to Ping.

Zhu Yufang, a rights defender in Jiangxi Ping commune, has recently publicly told the story of his departure from Beijing on 17 September. (b) On 24 January, the Human Rights Network transmitted information from her community of friends that around 3 a.m. the Beijing police had entered the residence of her friend and taken her to the police station of Hsinyama to work at the police centre; In the afternoon, she was handed over to government staff from Gangxi Ping commune and brought back to her place of origin.

From friend's home to case centre

According to her personal statement, she had visited her friends in Beijing and did not visit the State Department. She claims that fingerprints were taken, blood tests were conducted at the case centre, the password of the mobile phone was requested and the social platform chat records were examined. She also stated that the interrogators were concerned about their purpose in Kyoto and their contacts with persons outside the country.

These details are currently mainly from Ju Yuang himself. The public channels have not been able to see the SSP HSPD issue a police briefing on this operation, nor have they been published as an administrative summons, detention or other coercive measures, which has prevented the outside world from independently checking the specific procedures under which the police enter the house, take them away and cross-examine them.

Incidents have been referred across regions

Ju Yufang stated that she was handed over by the Sansan police to Ping Yuang on the afternoon of that day and was then taken back to Jiangxi. If this is true, the key procedural issues in the incident include the nature of the legal measures taken by the Beijing police, whether written formalities are issued, the status of Ping Mai personnel and their return, and whether the actions involved are part of the cross-regional collaboration within the security system of the letter.

According to public information from the Beijing City Housing Hills Government, the police substations in Hiyayama are responsible for the policing, criminal investigation, personnel management and emergency management of the districts. These general duties do not, however, indicate which of the legal powers specifically used in the present case.

Past visit history formed the background of events

Ju Yue Fong has been visiting for a long time in the context of the dispute over the relocation of the Jiangxi Ping commune. Public sentencing information and past reports from various media indicate that she served two sentences for “silent crimes”, the most recent of which expired in December

1. (b) The fact that the Defender of Rights has also reported that she was beaten and undertreated while serving her sentence; These allegations, which belong to the institutions and to one of the parties, have not been answered on a case-by-case basis by the prison authorities in open channels.

Part that can be identified and pending confirmation at present

It is now possible to confirm from two consecutive public reports that the news of Zhu Yufang ' s removal from Beijing on 17 September was followed by my own follow-up statement and that she returned to Jiangxi. There is still a lack of independent information on whether the removal process is as described, whether the relevant legal instruments were produced by the police but not made public, and the units of the Ping commune participants.

The public significance of the incident is essentially procedural: when a visitor from the field is taken away by the police in Beijing's private residence and subsequently returned to his place of origin, it is not the “visiting” status of the person concerned that determines the legality of the action, the clarity of the boundaries of power, but the specific legal basis, the written formalities and verifiable law enforcement records.