Ji Wen has filed a complaint against Judge Chen Li of the Roadbridge Court of Taizhou for illegal conduct.

Man I I I I Ii Man

Indictants: Ji Wen, civilian police officer, Huangjie Substation, Public Security Bureau, Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province

Alleged victim: Chen Li, People ' s Court Judge, Roadbridge District, Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province

Indictment

Indictments

In his trial of Administrative Case No. 58 (2025), Judge Chen Li, in violation of the Administrative Liangg (Law of the People ' s Republic of China) and the Supreme People ' s Court ' s interpretation of the application of the Administrative Litigation Law of the People ' s Republic of China, did not conduct a comprehensive review of the legality of the administrative acts complained of, turning a blind eye to the large number of offences committed by the accused in concealing and falsifying evidence, and merely examined the fact that the complainant, Ji Wen, had stopped the new acts of sabotage carried out by Ii Ik as part of the surveillance of the district, was assaulting others and serious violations of the law.

In order to defend their legitimate rights and interests, to uphold the proper application of the law and to uphold social justice, complaints are being filed in accordance with the law in order to avoid the speedy maintenance of the sentence in the second instance without a thorough review and to end up in a false and false case. (c) Request that Judge Chen Li be brought to justice for serious violations and held accountable for such violations.

According to the manner in which Judge Chen Li was examined, the attack on the Heming of Jiang Sukunshan was not an act of self-defence.

Judgement of first instance

Facts and reasons

Scientific incident

Developments

On the evening of 10 March 2025, at more than 20 p.m., Ike Wen visited the security room of the Zhejiang province, in the district of Zhejiang, in the district of Zhijiang, in the district of Zhijiang. Suddenly, Ishi Xin (the brother of Ike Wen, who did not live in the district of Ziwen) walked into the security room from outside and saw Ike Wen watching the surveillance, and kept saying, " Do not delete the surveillance, do not dial the surveillance power. I've been taking a video of Ike Wen, who didn't listen to me, and Ike Wen doesn't know what Ike is trying to do.

After the incident, Ike Wen learned that Ike had gone to his parents ' home the same night (the parents lived in the same district) and stopped the electric tatter downstairs. After 10 minutes, Ike Wen came back and found that the electric thong key was still intact, suspected that Ike Wen had removed his thong key and deleted the surveillance video from the surveillance room.

When Ji-Io began to carry out new operations to remove the power of surveillance in the district, and in an attempt to preserve what he considered to be evidence of the removal of his electric car key, Ii-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-D-I-I-I-I-I

Video: No one has been near the electric twilight since Ike's new arrival downstairs, until Ike's new arrival downstairs to get out of the room and find no electric twilight keys.

From the existing surveillance video, it appears that no one has approached his electric hyena, let alone taken his electric hyena key, from the time Idge stopped the electric hyena upstairs to the next 10 minutes.

The new Ikei behaviour is typical of a no-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go.

. In violation of article 59 of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People ' s Republic of China, Judge Chen Li shall not impose penalties for the accused to conceal the security guards he has kept, such as the Zhang Dil, Ikei Sun, Ji Guangwuk, Jiji Kyuji and Xiaolin, and to record the recordings in a simultaneous manner, without a reprimand or a confession.

During the trial, Ike Wen was shown a recording of the conversation with the police officer Li, who made it clear that the video was kept.

In two criminal cases in Ji Wen, the police of Taizhou, who were well aware of their actions, called the police officer Li, the then Director-General, Zhao Min Peng, to keep the simultaneous recordings of all persons, as prescribed by the Ministry of Public Security, who indicated that they had already kept them.

After the case had been brought to the administrative proceedings, Izwen examined the transcripts of the security guards present, which, unlike the facts, indicated that no similar statements had been made at the time of the statement.

Relevant provisions

Relevant provisions

(1) In 2018, the Ministry of Public Security issued Opinion on the Establishment of a Mechanism for the Sound Recording of the Full Process of Law Enforcement by Public Security Organs (Public Language) (No.

Article 2 stipulates that public security organs shall establish a sense of the imperative of law enforcement, strictly implement the requirements for reform of the trial-centred system of proceedings, and make a comprehensive record of all aspects of law enforcement activities, including through the recording of texts, pictures, audio and video records and information systems.

(2) On 17 November 2025, the Ministry of Public Security held a press conference: the whole process of law enforcement activities was marked and can be traced back to the administration.

. In violation of article 43 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation of the Application of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, Judge Chen Li did not consider “evidence obtained by illegal means” in relation to the forgery of a note by the defendant to extract a video from Ii Il-Il's new mobile phone, the clipping of a video taken from Ii-Il's new mobile phone, and the concealment of a simultaneous audio recording of the video taken from Ii-Il's new mobile phone.

Note to extract video from Ikei's new phone

Ikei's new phone video.

1 “Voice description of key content” is not consistent with actual video.

The audio-visual Keys Text Note shows that the new phone video was made available by the reporting person Ii Il, but from the saved video, it is clearly not filmed, extracted, and if it was filmed, at least the cell phone border can be seen.

2, the police officers, Li, and others, in the same time frame, created different legal instruments in different locations, which are clearly forged.

The video, which was taken by Ikei on his new phone, shows that the video was taken on 10 March 2025 at 22.14 a.m.-03 a.m.-23.14 a.m.-13 seconds. The video was made of the video by Li Jun-soo and Liu Iwai, and was signed by Yang In-hye and Li, who were not consistent. Meanwhile, during the aforementioned production period, the civilian police, Liu Iwai, participated in an inquiry into the “Dailian State” “Ike Shin” for “security guards in the sub-districts”. The police officer Li is involved in an interview with Ike Wen.

3 Videos were edited from Ichi ' s new mobile phone, which was 62 seconds long, but civilian police took one hour and 10 seconds to extract the video without simultaneous audio recording of the time taken.

From the surveillance video, it appears that Ii-Ii had seven minutes to enter the security room, and that the new written statement on page 20 of the file stated that after I had called the police, I began to yell at him for no reason, and that I was “smugly” “beating my parents” and that I had falsely accused him of something, and then I used my finger and said I was going to shoot me, and I took a phone to film the pool.

According to the new video from Ichi, which is provided by the current civilian police officer, Ichi Shin, who is moving forward to monitor the power supply, and who is being edited, the video is being edited.

From the reasons for this, when Ichi arrived in the security room, Ichi Wen was removing his electric car key and was removing the surveillance, and Ichi Shin should have picked up his phone for video recording.

. Judge Chen Li does not perform “video authenticity” for video taken from Ichi ' s phone by the defendant in violation of the law

The plaintiff, Ilwen, filed a “video authenticity assessment application” with Judge Chen Li before the trial, and the facts of the case show that the defendant had made a statement of the nature of the video, that the video was edited and that the video was in violation of the procedure, and that the authenticity of the video should be verified.

. Judge Chen Li has made no reply to the accused ' s high-resolution video of the incident scene, which reflects the full facts, and has forged the records of the surveillance technicians, making up a lie that cannot be removed from the centre for hours.

The security footage that was deleted, the two hours that happened, was deleted.

Bulletin posted by the police station where the police officer Lee is based

To cover up the fact that Ji Wen was merely trying to stop the new disruption of the surveillance of the district, and not to kick it to the new facts of Ii Il, the police officer Li was able to remove the high-resolution surveillance video from the scene of the incident and post a public announcement: Check the surveillance, call the police station in downtown and forge a statement from the surveillance technicians, proving that the surveillance could not be removed from the centre for several hours, and in fact, the surveillance could be removed from the centre for several hours.

The district commission and the property industry verified that the high-resolution surveillance system installed by the public security organs had been deleted, and that it had clearly seen the consequences of the whole thing, from the security room to the last, and what had happened in the security room that night.

The time Ikei entered the security room in the district was around 20:15 hours, and the time when the police officers left and returned to the police station was around 21:15 hours, the security guard ' s high-security surveillance video was missing just before 21:23 hours on the same day.

The technical staff of the company, which is responsible for monitoring the security of the West Side, is given a statement in the transcript that the single road surveillance cannot be deleted, and that the entire control mainframe can only be formatted for deletion, which is equivalent to the entire control re-entry of the district.

In fact, the surveillance video, which was located in the West Side Side, was accurately deleted for several hours on 11 March

1. According to the security guards in the area, a police officer in uniform had come to the police station and said he was a policeman.

During the March 2026 National Conference, they rotated the Ikem section, where they were sent to live, to follow and monitor Ikem, and on 10 March 2026, at around 2130 hours, Ikem caught one of the criminals in the security room of the Ikem district, where he was in the process of expanding the video surveillance pool under the building where the Ikem module was opened, when the 21.30 video was present.

That evening, I kept some surveillance videos, and the next day, Ikewen went back to the surveillance, and he set the password, and then took it and opened it up, and found that the video Iiwen had already stored earlier was deleted, and the security guard in the district said that a person in police uniform had come to the surveillance station and claimed to be a police officer.

Monitored with password set

Ii Wen has pre-served surveillance

The monitored after the deleted

The evidence of iron: the security technicians stated in their notes that single-circuit surveillance could not be deleted, and that if the entire control mainframe was to be formatted, it would be the same as the entire block of surveillance re-entry. That's a lie.

They removed the surveillance to cover up the fact that Ikei's video and Ikei's not kicked to Iki's new phone.

Judge Chen Li removed the high-resolution surveillance video from the scene of the incident, which reflected the full facts, and set Ikem to Ishiki, which rained, wet the ground, no stains on the new pants of Iki, and the plaintiff Ichim toil did not kick into the new facts of Iki Iki and did not answer any questions

High-coloured photographs of Ikei's new pants, with no stain. Source of information in the case file

It is clear from the video that the rain was raining that day and that there was water on the ground, and if Ike Wen really kicked to Ike Ishiki, the new Ichi Iki pants would be stained.

At the time, Ike Wen was only trying to remove the pool, preventing Ike from entering the security room to remove the power, destroying the security facilities in the sub-district, and merely lifting his feet to achieve the new purpose of Ike Day, without any new purpose at all, or to kick Iki.

During the first trial, the accused court heard that when the police officers arrived at the scene, Ichiji shot something new on his pants, and that Ii Wen court requested a video showing Iki Sun's pants not being taken, and that the accused, the SSP, lied in court.

. Judge Chen Li ' s response to the complainant ' s actions is not a violation of the administration of public order, as expressly stated by the Ministry of Public Security, but an act of self-defence, without any answer.

Relevant judicial interpretation

Relevant judicial interpretations

Article 1 of the Interpretation (ii) (Public Language [2007]

1. of the Law on Penalties for the Administration of Public Security in the Republic of China, concerning the implementation by public security organs of the Law on the Administration of Public Security in the Republic, stipulates that, with regard to the legal responsibility for the suppression of violations of public security, the suppression of violations of the law and order in order to protect against the ongoing violations of the public security administration profession is not an offence against the administration of public order.

Article 6 of the Supreme Law of 28 August 2020, the Supreme Prosecutor and the Ministry of Public Security, " 10 Directives on the Legal Application of the Regime of Self-Defence " (No. 2020 31), provides that: Self-defence must be directed against ongoing violations. (b) Where there is a real and imminent risk of unlawful abuse, it should be considered that it has already begun; (b) Where unlawful acts, although temporarily interrupted or stopped, remain a real possibility for the perpetrators of such violations to continue to be committed, they should be considered as continuing; The circumstances in which the defence is to be based, and the general public is aware of the law, should be used to make reasonable judgements as to whether or not the unlawful assault has been committed or ended, and the defence cannot be imposed.

From the available in-person video, it appears that after Ikei was stopped from the security room in the district, Ichiji returned to the security room in the district, and that Iki Xing was found to have dialed his electric key, Ikei was deleting the surveillance video, and Iki Xianji was new to remove the surveillance power for the purpose of preventing him from removing the key to the Ikei, so that the new Iki Iki unlawful assault could not stop.

Until after the police station arrived, Ichi Xinjiang proudly said that Ike Wen was removing the keys to his electric car at night...

After Ikei had taken a video from his new phone, after Ikei had returned to the security room, his efforts to extract the power from the surveillance system and damage the security facility did not stop.

Pull the Ike Ishiki to the front door and Ike Wen back to the security room.

After the police station called the scene, Ike Ishiki said to Ike Wen: What are you doing with the surveillance video at night?

Judge Chen Li did not answer the violation for which the defendant actually detained the plaintiff for more than four days.

Released at 10:07 a.m. on November 5, 2025.

The ticket to Beijing, the police officer Li, the police officer, stopped Ike Wen at the security checkpoint at Ningbo Airport at about 1845 hours on 1 September 2025.

On 1 September 2025, at about 0645 hours, the civilian police General Lee Sweung stopped Ji Wen at the security checkpoint at Ningbo airport for the purpose of carrying out administrative detention of Ike Wen. By 0644 hours on 5 September, four days of administrative detention had been completed. The detention centre of the Huangjii Public Security Directorate refused to release the person on the grounds that the 9.3 grand parade security would be lifted in the afternoon of 5 September, and that if Ike Wen was released on time, Ike Wen would still have time to arrive in Beijing before the security was lifted.

Justice has become a tool for combating reprisals, and the rule of law has changed to that of interceptions.

Judge Chen Li has ignored the defendants ' ultimatum and the fact that the new offences committed by Ikei were not dealt with in accordance with the law.

The new Ikei act is typical of a sham, a sham, and a charisma by Li, who suspended the investigation on the grounds that there was no violation of the law.

Judge Chen Li has cooperated with the accused and has been in close contact with the accused during the 9.3 grand military parade, losing impartiality and allowing the state to follow the advanced practice of “exclude administrative interference and separate trials of “civil affairs officers” in Taizhou”

Orders with Executive Board seals

Report of the administrative case of the Taizhou Central Court

Proclamation of the Expatriate Jurisdiction of Administrative Cases of the Taizhou Central Court

X. Factual facts of serious violations of the law by Judge Chen Li, in which the decision was taken without a vote

The case is the administrative version of the case in which the attack on the Jiangsukunshan Ha Myung was considered self-defence, and the Supreme People ' s Procuratorate, " Why did He Myung ' s act be considered self-defence? " — The Analytical Opinion on the case of Quinshan “8.27” is fully appropriate in the present case.

Source of information from the Supreme People ' s Procuratorate Network

The analysis of the Supreme People ' s Procuratorate that Heiming ' s actions are self-defence is sufficient to conclude that Ji Wen ' s actions are self-defence:

Ikei has been a new cause of trouble and has been the first to make a mistake.

1. The sub-district surveillance facilities are being exposed to the real danger of new damage to the Ikei.

1. The actions of Ji Wen, the new Ike Iki, to launch the sub-districts are a normal response in the event of an emergency and meet the special defence requirements.

1. The protection of defenders should be given priority in terms of the institutional value of self-defence. “Legality does not have to give in to unlawful behaviour”.

What would I hope for if I had a justice like this one that beats parents and plaintiff Ilwen?

Ike Il Xin, a civil servant of the market supervision authority of the Huangjiang district of Zhejiang province and city of Taizhou, was recruited to the Yellowstone district business office in around 1983 and was beaten, abused parents and Ikewen at home for a long time.

In around 2000, the new brothers of Ike, Ike Guangw (also a civil servant of the market supervision authority of the Huangl district of Zhejiang province and Taizhou city), illegally operating a business, using his power to cover the business of packaging bags in the district, selling them at high prices, illegally acquiring large amounts of property, now totalling over billions of yuan.

After Ikei had brutally beaten his father, he went to the photo studio himself.

Mother told herself I picked her up and hit her head against the wall

Ike Il Xin (Sing) in the Unit

Two new villas in Ikei

Ike Iki and Ike Kwang-Wuk shared a plant that is charged over 2 million rents per year

In view of the above, in order to defend their legitimate rights and interests, to safeguard the proper application of the law and to safeguard social justice, the complaint is based on the Law on the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Justice in Cases of Offences by the People ' s Courts (Preliminary), the Regulations on the Punishment of the Personnel of the People ' s Courts, the Code of Conduct for Judges, the Opinions of the Supreme People ' s Court on the Improvement of the Judicial Accountability of the People ' s Courts, the Regulation on the Establishment of Cases by the People ' s Procuratorate to Investigate Certain Issues of Crimes Committed by Judicial Personnel in the Service of the People ' s Procuratorate, and the Law is being investigated and effectively upheld.

Here you go.

Supreme People ' s Court

Zhejiang Provincial High People ' s Court

Intermediate People ' s Court of the city of Taizhou

Supreme People ' s Procuratorate

Zhejiang Province People ' s Procuratorate

People ' s Procuratorate of Taizhou City

Submitted by: Ike Wen

27 September 2026