From the 13 August accident to the 22 August liability determination: the nine-day power track of the Po County Public Officer Drunk Driving

On the evening of 13 August, a traffic accident occurred on the 520 line of the State Road of Xue Guan town, Shanxi province, which resulted in two deaths. On 12 September, the Phui County Public Security Bureau issued a circular confirming that the perpetrator, Duichi, was a government employee in Xue ' s town, had a blood alcohol content of 147.01mg/100ml and was travelling at approximately 52 km at the time of the incident, exceeding a 40 km limit, and had not opened his lights at night. The deceased Zhang Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho is a married couple.

Nine days later, on 22 August, the traffic management brigade of the Phu County Public Security Bureau concluded that the accident was a major responsibility: Duichi was responsible for the accident and the deceased husband and wife were responsible for the minor responsibility. The family subsequently applied for review and the traffic management detachment of the Pygmy City Public Security Bureau was admitted.

These nine days constitute the most valuable part of the case. The facts of driving drunk, speeding and not turning on lights at night have been confirmed by the police themselves, and the accident has also resulted in the death of two people; In such cases, why is responsibility classified as “primary-secondary” and central to the whole case?

August 13: Three driving violations occurred simultaneously

The data given in the police circular did not leave any ambiguity. (a) A certain blood alcohol content of 147.01 mg/100ml, which is already in the drunk drive; The 40-km road is about 52 km; The lights were not turned on at night. After three acts of violence, the vehicle crashed into Zhang Hoi, Guo Hoi, who was passing the Manpower Vehicle, and Zhang Yai died instantly and was not rescued.

After the accident, Du Chiu was held in criminal detention. The Government of Xue Guan town confirmed the status of its staff and established a coordination group to process follow-up compensation.

This step has moved the case from a common traffic accident to a public power case: the perpetrator is the municipality ' s government, and the determination of responsibility is carried out by the public security transfer department within the same district ' s territorial power system.

22 August: deceased persons are included in the “secondary responsibility”

Nine days later, the traffic management brigade of the Phu County Public Security Bureau issued an accident decision. The traffic police held Zhang Hoi-Chou and Guo-Chou to be secondary responsibility for failing to fulfil their obligation to confirm safe passage by crossing the road without any one.

The most important of this finding is the word “security confirmation”. On the night road, when a car was not lighted, the driver was drunk and speeding was excessive, the conditions for pedestrians to judge the location and speed of the vehicle had been significantly changed. The risk is reallocated to the deceased, not by a single rule of traffic, but by full evidence of on-site lighting, distance, vehicle tracks, brake distance, and the time when pedestrians enter the road.

The letter of determination of the incident is therefore not just a procedural document, but the most important document of power in the whole case. It determines the direction of criminal responsibility, civil compensation and public judgement on the fairness of the case.

The change in civil status is not a legal criterion but a power relationship in a case

Duichi ' s position in the Xuewan town government does not automatically determine the responsibility for transportation, but changes the power structure in the case. In the county society, the town government, public security, the transfer of power, the administration of justice and the party organs have long been within a highly interwoven organizational system. In the case of major accidents between ordinary rural families and public officials, the environment is not symmetrical.

(b) The family of the deceased had no right to site survey, no right to examine evidence and no right to determine responsibility; These powers are in the hands of the public security authorities. The perpetrators are members of the local party system. That is why the findings of an accident must be more transparent than in ordinary cases.

Xi has strengthened the party ' s vertical leadership of the political and legal system in the era of Xi, so that grass-roots public security is first embedded in the political organization system, rather than independent of the local administrative network. When cases involving public officials occur in the county, the public ' s confidence in the outcome is directly determined by whether the procedure is capable of segregating acquaintances, unit influence and administrative coordination.

Review sent the case to the Pleasant, but found that responsibility had been left.

After the family applied for review, the traffic management detachment of the Pymnasium Public Security Bureau took over. The higher level of transfer now requires a re-examination of site surveys, vehicle identification, alcohol testing, speed measurement, road conditions and original liability allocation.

Whatever the eventual change in review, the original determination of 22 August has formed a clear set of accountability nodes:

• Toi has direct driving responsibilities;
• The traffic management unit of the Pun County Public Security Bureau is responsible for on-site investigations and the division of responsibilities;
• Professional judgement by the person who signed, examined and approved the original accident;
• The Phu County Public Security Bureau assumes institutional responsibility for the entire law enforcement system;
• The Government of Xue Guan town assumes responsibility for the daily discipline of its staff and for the post-incident organization;
• The traffic management unit of the Pyithu City Public Security Bureau is responsible for reviewing the bias.

The focus of this chain is not to wait for a final conclusion, but to record how power works: who has the evidence, who writes down “primary responsibility”, who includes the deceased in “secondary responsibility”, and who is responsible for re-examination.

An incident certificate tested the local authority's treatment of “persons in the system”

In a circular dated 12 September, the Phu District Public Security Bureau stressed that public officials were “not treated with care, downgrade or delay” for offences. This sentence was included in the circular because the public status of the case had become the central context for public judgement.

The real test is not the slogan, but the document. (a) The criminal proceedings are only part of the criminal proceedings against Mr. Pradu; The allocation of responsibility for accidents determines whether local power translates institutional advantages into identity advantages.

How would it be written if a regular driver was drunk, speeding, without lights at night and killed two people? When drivers became town government staff, did the standards change? This is the most direct public comparison of the case.

China's pursuit of the case was not “controversial” because of its “disputation” but because, from 13 August to 22 August, a complete track of power had emerged: public officials had committed a serious and dangerous driving act and two people had died; The local transfer department completes the distribution of responsibility nine days later and puts part of the responsibility on the deceased; Families can only seek redress for their past public security system.

In a highly centralized system that lacks independent judicial and external oversight, procedural documents are often the footprint of power. The certificate of accreditation for the incident in Po County is worth long-term preservation and item-by-case tracking.