He was taken back to Zhengzhou from Beijing and detained for 10 days: Xu Pei complained about the interruption of kidney treatment while in custody

An application to the authorities documented the return of Henan defender Xu Pei from Beijing to Zhengzhou, the loss of her liberty for 10 days, and her alleged history of drug interruptions during her detention. Humans Watch reported on 28 September that Seo Bei, a long-standing land complaint, was brought back by the Zhengzhou police on 15 September and then held in administrative detention for 10 days on charges of disturbing the order of the unit, and was released on 25 September. She claims that she suffers from kidney problems and that she was not able to use the medication properly while in detention, and sent an administrative review on 27 September.

15 September: complainants were taken back to their places of origin

Xu Pei has long filed complaints on land and natural resource management issues. She reported to Human Life Watch that the alleged violations had not been committed in Beijing and that she was taken back to the Jin Shui Division of the Zhengzhou City Public Security Bureau. (a) Ten days of detention means that the administrative penalty has been directly applied to her personal freedom; The decision on how to record the facts and evidence also became a central dispute in her application for annulment.

18 September: she talks about threats and drug cuts in detention

Xu Pei stated that while in detention at the Third Detention Centre in Zhengzhou City, his established kidney treatment was interrupted and he was not given the proper medication and necessary examinations. She also alleges that on the afternoon of 18 September, staff members requested that they should not go to Beijing again for two years. The latter concerns the space for action between the parties seeking to complain and to be able to address the issue to the relevant authorities; The former statement is directly related to medical arrangements in places of detention. Both are statements by Seo Pee himself, as reported in Life Watch.

“I hope that you will keep me alive. “-Suh Pei, quoted in the Report.

25-27 September: continued to seek the lifting of punishment after release

After the end of his detention on 25 September, Seo-bae still had to deal with his physical condition and his original land claims. On 27 September, she sent an application for administrative review requesting the withdrawal of the previous administrative penalty. Her claim for relief relates to at least two specific issues: the acts and facts on which the administrative authorities relied for the 10 days of detention; (c) The treatment, examination and treatment of chronically ill persons during their detention.

The medical records in the detention facility are the other half of the case that cannot be ignored

Administrative detention is not only a decision to punish, but also means that the access, life and medical care of detainees are placed under the control of the place of detention. If a person who needs a long-term drug report a interruption in treatment, the health check-up, the established drug register, the medical records and referral arrangements are all materials that can provide a specific answer to his or her experience. The situation described by Xu Pei is dealt with in relation to basic medical care during periods of restriction of liberty.

The key records of the case include:

• The facts and legal basis for the decision of the Goldwater Division to hold a person in administrative detention for 10 days;
• Health and pharmaceutical information submitted or described at the Xu Pei Institute;
• Medical clinic and medical records of the place of detention from 15 to 25 September;
• Information on the receipt and follow-up of the application for administrative review of 27 September.

The Xu Pei case has brought together two specific public questions: why a long-standing complainant was deprived of his liberty for 10 days; Who can provide a verifiable medical statement when she reports in administrative detention that there has been a disruption of treatment? Land disputes do not disappear as a result of a single administrative detention and the medical needs of the person cannot be set aside because of his or her presence in a detention facility.