In many cases, even a lawless person can tell the truth, but in a civil dispute in Yunnan Province, Yunnan County, the court gave a rather controversial answer.

Start with a map.

The following picture is a judgment sent by the Yunnan Provincial People's Court of Yunnan County to the female entrepreneur Li Zhang Li at the end of July 2026.

The main characteristic of the judgment is that there is no public charter of the court.

Winning 100,000 to 800,000? Yunnan female entrepreneur falls into "one case three lawsuits" judicial misfortune

However, what is more controversial than the “unclassified judgment” is the fact of the case itself.

Time goes back to seven years ago.

On July 3, 2019, Kunming Yang Liang Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Yang Liang Construction") successfully targeted a small project of the Hengda Group company

  • the first existing well power supply and water supply project in Kunming Jiang Cultural Tourist City.

After Yang Lin built the project, on August 28 of the same year, the entire project was transferred to Li Zhiqiang, a female entrepreneur in Zhongming County, and the two sides signed the contract project construction responsibility letter.

As for the project itself, everything went well.

On April 30, 2020, the project was successfully completed after the contracting party accepted the qualification.

On March 17, 2021, Yang Lin Construction and Construction Employer owner settled the entire department of the project with a commercial transaction bill, deducted from the total tax and management fees agreed with Li Zhiqi, a total of 6.6 million yuan, and paid Li Zhiqi the remaining project amount of 5.5 million yuan.

By this time, the construction transaction between the two sides was completely terminated and the total debt of the creditors was reduced to zero.

It was unthinkable that four years later, in 2025, Yang Lin Construction Workers, on the basis of a "contractual dispute", brought Li to court.

Yang Lin Builders charged Li with the case in court with the purpose of letting Li Li bear all the losses caused by his company's debts caused by the project.

The fundamental reason for Yang Lin's construction debt bumping up was the company's commercial exchange note with the ticket number 210373102197820210115822337171 from the Hengda settlement project in 2021.

In 2021, Hengda is still at its peak, and its issuance of trade notes belongs to the hard currency that can be circulated and traded in the market.

At the time of transit, Yang Lin Builders settled this commercial exchange note from Yangtze, in 2022 circulated in the market for a few rounds and finally fell to Shaanxi Hunan Star Shenzhen Company, the exchange failed.

This unsuccessful trade acceptance bill is a prequel to the Great Storm.

After the legal lawsuit was initiated by Shaanxi Hangzhou Shenzhen Company, after the judgment and enforcement of the people's court of the 2nd district of Xi'an city, Yang Lin was deposited in the amount of 860,000 yuan.

Yang Lin believes that the loss of 860,000 yuan caused by this transaction, requires the actual construction company Li Zhiang to bear the full responsibility.

This is equivalent to a boss being beaten, who thinks that the reason for being beaten is the cause of the workers who come to work, so that the workers bear the full responsibility.

This lawsuit, which appears to have no heads, and is suspected of a crime of "false litigation", was rejected by the Zhongming County People's Court in its entirety.

By the end of 2025, the case was reversed.

After the second trial of the middle people's court in Kunming, Li was sentenced to bear 60 percent of Yang Lin's construction losses, that is, 525,000 yuan.

The second court ruling in Kunming Court opened the Pandora’s box.

On June 27, 2024, Yang Lin was investigated by the tax department for misrepresentation of the VAT invoice and sentenced to a fine of "supplemental value added tax of 200,000 and a fine of 80,000 yuan."

This account was also counted by Yang Lin's construction worker on Lee's head.

Yang Lin Builders boldly filed a second lawsuit with the court, asking Li to bear all the losses.

Per because of the "sample judgment" of the Kunming Central Court, this time, the Zhongming court directly made the judgment, and sentenced Li to bear Yang Lin's construction tax of 28,000%, or 16.8 thousand yuan.

At the moment of receiving the judgment, Li Zhangry collapsed.

In the view of Li Zhuri, Yang Lin's claim for construction was completely unfounded and without any reason.Ten thousand steps back, she undertook the project to Yang Lin's construction, all should be taxed less than 100 thousand yuan, and at the time of settlement of the project amount has been deducted by Yang Lin's construction workers, why was the court sentenced to pay 16.8 thousand yuan?

Why should you pay for the illegal consequences of Yuan Lin's construction of false value added tax bills?

Even more remarkable is that Yang Lin was prosecuted for VAT invoices, but in the court ruling, it was hard-to-do changed to corporate income tax.

Winning 100,000 to 800,000? Yunnan female entrepreneur falls into "one case three lawsuits" judicial misfortune

Is there anything hidden behind this unknown?

The lawsuit initiated by Yang Lin on Li Zhang Li seemed to have no end.

Regarding one of the interest losses, Yang Lin also filed a lawsuit with the court separately, asking Li to bear all the interest losses that his company needs to bear.

The same recipe, the same taste, the same fact confirmed.

According to a judgment by the People's Court of Yunnan County, Li Shigori must bear 60 percent of Yang Lin's construction interest loss, which is $38,553.

Since then, in this civil dispute of "one case and three cases", Li has started with a contract million projects to earn a hundred thousand profits, and ended with three lawsuits to compensate the contracting party for the losses of eight hundred thousand.

Li is also a person with a certain social influence.

She is a member of the Huanming County Political Council, the chairman of the Women Entrepreneurs Association, or the Huanming County Business Environment Supervisor.

Winning 100,000 to 800,000? Yunnan female entrepreneur falls into "one case three lawsuits" judicial misfortune

The rule of law is the best business environment.

A female entrepreneur who is influential in the local area and is a member of the CPC and supervisor of the business environment, is caught up in the "business environment" and "judicial trouble" can not get rid of themselves.

In a complaint material written by Li to the upper department, she directly outlined the nature of the problem:

After the case was wrong, Vice President of the Court Zhao Mou allegedly interfered with justice, privately issued a compulsory case order to Chief Justice Guo Ping, explicitly requested that its judgment results must be fully unified with Chief Justice Liu Mou 2982, and even with the "political future termination" to threaten the judge, forced the judge to violate the facts and the law wrong judgment. After a multi-party verification and verification, the second trial revision judgment was the leadership of Chief Justice Zhao Hong in private contact with the Chief Justice, privately appealed to the Chief Justice for the violation of the lawful and just judgment of the 2974 and completely destroyed the judicial independence order.

In the complaint materials, Li asked: why, under strict judicial discipline, many courts still lead the case, manipulate the judge's results, so that the innocent people are held accountable?

Nowadays, Li Zhirri, both doubts the fairness of the law, and believes that the law will eventually restore her a fairness.

One of the words she often hangs in her mouth is: Day Shōshū!

MEMBER DISCUSSION

Article discussion

Verified members can discuss this report publicly and manage their own content.