Judicial blind areas under power detention: Real evidence of disabled men tears grassroots law enforcement and judgment doubts

The bottom line of the rule of law society lies in the control of public power and the mutual protection of the rights and interests of citizens. When a handicapped person with disabilities holds documents, presents diagnostic documents, sends a bloodshed complaint to the society through public video, it reflects not only the hardships of individual rights defense, but also the serious questions facing grassroots law enforcement norms and judicial process justice.

Disabled vehicles trigger back-to-back disputes: police intervention in consultations has evolved into a bloodshed conflict

The incident originated from the real name report by the disabled man of Chongqing, Chongqing. According to the diagnosis certificate and judicial documents shown by the parties, in May 2021, Chongqing purchased a disabled scooter, used for a month after being seized by the local police force and asked for proof. Because the disabled car could not handle the relevant documents, Chongqing reached a deal with the seller. However, the seller took the vehicle to repair and then claimed the car was "no longer necessary" to refuse to execute the withdrawal agreement.

In order to resolve the problem of vehicle handling, on the morning of July 22, 2021, the dynasty went to the Witchie County police force in search of Captain Wang Binh, who failed, and then contacted Wang Binh by the Comrade of the Public Security Bureau by telephone, Wang Binh agreed to do so. On the afternoon at 2:30 p.m., Wang Binh met Wang Binh in the building of the police force. According to the dynasty, Wang Binh disregarded him after receiving the telephone, turned away and declared "no matter". When Wang Binh asked "who I am looking for," Wang Binh suddenly turned his finger and wounded his eyes, resulting in bleeding.

Obstruction of medical treatment during detention: forced confession, forced confession and false evidence cloud

After the conflict occurred, the Malay dynasty was lying in the scene for half an hour without anyone asking, until the family arrived at the police, the police sent him a medical photo, then sent him directly to the department to sign the confession of guilt.

▶Judicial blind areas under power detention: Real evidence of disabled men tears grassroots law enforcement and judgment doubts，正文视频

During the two months and eight days of detention, the handling of the case revealed a number of unusual details:

• Medical relief was delayed: M.D.H. in custody frequent vomiting, headaches, the doctor was refused to apply for medication, until a high fever after several days to obtain drug treatment.
• The rape process was concealed, the case officer was suspected of forcing confession: the case officer M.D.H. in the preliminary material only recorded M.D.H. in the case, the fact that he was beaten by M.D.H. was not mentioned, and compelled the court on September 29, 1921 to file his signature and conduct a prosecution; the case prosecutor and M.D.H. self-employed defence lawyer Zhou Daiwei, also persuaded him "don't report Bin, don't pursue, you will release." -

Complaints at all levels are entangled in a “push cycle”: evidence is not drawn, written answers are blank

After obtaining amnesty, the Malay Dynasty exercised a long complaint defence right. it reflected to the Witchie County Public Security Bureau, the County Disciplinary Commission, the County Court, and mailed the material to the Chongqing City Prosecutor's Office, but was asked to "search evidence on its own"; then it reflected to the Chongqing City Public Security Disciplinary Inspection Group and the Chongqing in Witchie County Inspection Group, the inspection group had handed over to the Witchie County Disciplinary Commission and the Public Security Bureau to handle, and promised to give written statements.

However, in the subsequent connection, the case unit not only canceled the written response, only switched to telephone contact, and when the Malay Dynasty requested the official proof of the original evidence based on the judgment, the case unit was always unable to provide; at the same time, the official evidence of the hospital diagnosis certificate submitted by the Malay Dynasty is generally unacceptable, and the internal testimony is unilaterally collected.

Public authority supervision is not disqualified, authority investigation must be launched urgently

At the end of the report, the Malay Dynasty said that the wrong case not only caused his body to be seriously injured and so far depended on medication, but also had a huge serious impact on the future of his children.The parties stated that they bear full legal responsibility for the authenticity of the evidence and asked the senior leadership to thoroughly investigate the matter.

Public authority can not be a barrier to asylum law enforcement and violence, judicial judgment can not be based on the hiding of facts and flawed evidence chain.About the disabled groups submitted written material and detailed complaints, the higher level prosecutor's office and the supervisory committee should quickly launch the review mechanism, announce the case on the day of the whole process of surveillance video and the original volume, thoroughly check whether there is the preservation, hypocrisy and judicial abuse, as well as the parties and the public a transparent exchange.