After 168 days of detention, she was over 60 pounds thin: she was said to have been handcuffed, frozen, slapped herself and her nursing daughter was pressured.

The former Secretary and Chairman of the Bank of Grande Fontaine, Jiangsu, lost over 60 pounds of weight after 168 days of detention. September 23rd, The Chinese Digital Age Archived Micro-Media Publics Report by Shaol Ying-Lao, Liu Tiger < reveals that the jade leaf claims to have been held in a fixed position for long periods of time, torn by handcuffs, tied-down, low temperature freeze, restricted water and sleep , and is required to slap himself repeatedly, up to a maximum of 800 per one time. More seriously, his nursing daughter was subsequently held in custody and used to pressure her to confess.

According to the family, the prairie had not made a statement of guilt for a long time before her daughter was kept in custody and had repeatedly refused to sign the statement. After her daughter was brought into the same retention system, she saw the material and video and was told that her situation was related to her confession. His statements subsequently changed. If this timeline is correct, the question is not “whether the interrogation was excessive”, but whether the close relative's personal liberty was used by the investigating authorities to make statements.

<a href="https://www.sohu.com/a/583222069_121106832"target" rel = "noopener noreferrer" data-linked-reference= "tru" data-reference-label= "public information"” The public information shows that the jade leaves were long-time members of Jiangsu Noun-Sun Sin and served as secretary, director and representative of the Salt City People of Jiangsu Dafu Rural Commercial Bank. On 27 August 2025, he was taken away by members of the Jiangsu Provincial Inspectorate and subsequently held in detention for 168 days. In August 2026, the case was heard at the Zhang Jia Hong Kong City Court, where he was charged with embezzlement of over $15.9 million and the illegal granting of a loan of $35 million.

It is not only the eventual conviction but the evidence that really determines the credibility of the case. The persons who had reported the cases, including the Zhong Jian Fei, Pan Kong, had threatened to retain their daughters, freeze family assets and hold other relatives accountable. If the relevant simultaneous recording, retention and interrogation transcripts corroborate these statements, then it will directly touch upon the illegal taking of evidence rather than general management defects.

requires the inspection body to guarantee the food, rest, safety and medical care of the detained persons and to arrange for reasonable time for interrogation; <a href="https://www.samr.gov.cn/jjz/djfg/gjflfg/art/2025/art_688b276784a844488345dceec0ae5c52.html"target" rel = "nopener noreferrer" data-linked-reference= "tru" data-reference-label = "Regulation for the Application of the Inspection Law of the People's Republic of China" more explicitly prohibits violence, threats, insults, abuse, corporal punishment and disguised corporal punishment, and provides that statements made under threat of serious harm to the rights of the person or close relatives shall be made in accordance with the law Review exclusion.

This means that there are now two factual lines that must be tried simultaneously in the case of the Kamyota: one is corruption and illegal lending, as alleged by the prosecution; Another is whether the manner in which the prosecution body obtained the key statements was lawful. It is not reasonable to acquiesce in all the means at the detention stage because a person is charged with a duty offence. Instead, the more centralized the powers and the more closed the interrogations, the more the need for simultaneous video, medical records and complete time lines are being examined externally.

The special features of the retention system are that the person under investigation has been under the full control of the Ombudsman for a long time, that lawyers are unable to intervene as promptly as normal criminal proceedings and that it is difficult for the family to have the truth. That is why, in the event of charges of re-cuffing, freezing, self-harming and coercion of family members, the court cannot look at the final transcript, but must look back at the conditions under which it was formed.

The public significance of the case of the jade leaf does not depend on his eventual guilt. The real answer is: whether the institution of the prosecution can, while having high degree of personal control, leave the evidence-taking process without sufficient external oversight; When the defendant stated that the statement had been formed under physical and relative pressure, the court was not willing to access the original video, medical material and to exclude evidence of violation. If the retention system cannot accept such a review, it is difficult to prove that it is not a closed system that imposes obligations on the person under investigation, but leaves the case to escape supervision.