Many students in Chongqing's primary school bleed their nose and parents asked about the air safety and reliability of the new school building.

Chongqing, Chongqing, China Primary School in Chongqing, China has recently caused parents to continue to question students' health abnormalities.X account "Teacher Li is not your teacher" released live videos and materials provided by parentsA number of students in the school have recently experienced rhinoplasty, and some parents have pointed the issue to the quality of indoor air in the newly renovated school building, and questioned the qualification of the school's said testing.

Children repeatedly bleed their nose, parents pointed questions to the school environment

From the publicly disseminated parental material, the core of the controversy is not an accidental physical discomfort, but after several students had similar symptoms, parents asked to know whether the child's classroom environment was safe for long periods of time each day.

The most urgent need of parents is not a "qualification", but the ability to verify the complete results of the testing body, sampling conditions, testing time and specific values.

Why did the “test qualification” not end the controversy?

According to the parents who gathered, "Teacher Lee is not your teacher"For parents, if the students continue to have abnormal symptoms, simply announcing the results is not enough to answer the question whether indoor air testing is completed in a normal teaching environment, the state of the door window, whether the testing project covers volatile organic substances other than formaldehyde, and whether the original report can be fully disclosed, will directly affect the parents' judgment on the conclusion.

Further information that is currently required to be disclosed includes at least:

• the number and time distribution of students with symptoms such as nasal bleeding;
• the specific time of the school building renovation, completion and use;
• the name of the institution, the sampling method and the complete report of the two tests;
• whether the symptoms of the symptoms have been unified medical examination;
• whether the education, health and other departments have been involved in independent re-examination.

Parents said related content was requested to be deleted, more dramatic information is asymmetrical

Social media reports also claimed that parents were asked to delete the case after publishing it. If this claim is true, the event would no longer be just a campus environmental testing dispute, but also involve the right of parents to express health concerns.

Children’s health issues should be answered by independent review

As of now, public material can prove that parents are questioning students' nose blood and campus environment, but it is not enough to directly prove that students' symptoms are caused by formaldehyde. Medical causality needs to be examined and professional assessment, and campus air quality should also rely on reviewable testing data judgment.

Because the cause and effect relationship still needs professional confirmation, local relevant departments have a greater responsibility to organize independent review and disclose the full results.In the face of a group of children who study at school every day, public institutions can not require parents to believe the conclusions first, then wait for explanation; should first put the data, procedures and facts out, so that parents can judge whether the environment in which the child is safe.