From the "East Asian sex scandal" to the cross-provincial pressure of thousands of miles: former journalists exposed to Jiangsu government law officials for a decade to alienate power and law enforcement violations

Recently, the former "Chinese Commercial Times" reporter Li Yuan publicly developed emergency assistance and real-name reporting materials on the network, sparking a tsunami of public opinion. Li Yuan said that during his residence in Chongqing, he suddenly encountered the pressure of four civilian police officers of the Qin Huai branch of the Nanjing Municipal Public Security Bureau to go to Chongqing for thousands of years. The persons involved in the situation of not being vigilant, not showing the calling and handling procedures, not contacting the local public security station, repeatedly knocked on the door and forced to open the door. And behind this public violation of the norms of the trans-provincial case procedure, they engaged in a decade-long official scandal of power and interests-seeking

Abnormal “thousand miles across provinces”: no procedure to go to the door with the suspect “forced silence”

According to the material and video recording evidence of Li Yuan disclosed, the Nanjing Qin Huai District Public Security Branch of the civil police of the day four people, by the self-proclaimed alarm number 21401 of the civilian police Zhang Yuawa band, headed straight to Li Yuan's current residence in Chongqing. In the whole process of law enforcement, the four people did not wear police uniform as prescribed, nor could show any legal calling certificate, foreign cooperation letter or formal law enforcement procedures, even completely bypassed the counter-procedure of Chongqing public security organs and jurisdictional departments, only to "find you a few words" by frequently knocking on the door.

From the awareness of self-protection, Li Yuan carried out the full process of video and recording notes, and repeatedly proposed to the other party: cross-provincial cases must go through the formal cooperation process of the two local public security organs, present formal law enforcement documents and accompanied by the local jurisdiction civil police. However, the officials always refrain from providing complete identity certificates and legal proceedings, only repeatedly urged to open the door, can not explain the specific cause. Li Yuan pointed out that this obviously serious procedure violation of law enforcement, in fact, because of his hands mastered major violations of law evidence involving the Nanjing political law system, suffered from "trans-provincial accurate pressure and violent acts."

The situation then escalated further. Following the strong demands and questions of Li Yuan, the persons involved then went to the Chongqing two-Jiang new district new brandy station. The relevant police officer of the new brandy station told Li Yuan in a phone call that the other party said that "there is nothing, just to understand the situation, will not take measures." This series of strange and out of the legal track operation completely exposed the motives of this cross-provincial incident under the public eye.

Drawing out a decade of power colour network: the distorted conspiracy of political law officials, police and civil police and state-owned employees

Li Yuan became the target of cross-provincial pressure, arising from the complete chain of evidence retained and held in his hands. Reporting materials show that the core source of the incident lies in the long-term disciplinary violations and inappropriate relations disputes between the civilian police of the department of the Nanjing Moongama Lake, Zheng (named after) and the senior leader of the Jiangsu Provincial Political and Legal Commission, "Zhu Secretary".

Reported material disclosure of the core persons involved in the case and conflicts of interest:

The complainant (translated as Xiao Xu): employee of the large state-owned company "Tokyo Airways". reports that it has had intercourse with 5 civilian police officers at the department of Nanjing's Liaoning Lake (including 4 single civilian police officers who are normally in love, but the married community civilian police Zhong Xu hasined a long-term relationship with his lover in the marriage).

In the case of civil police Zheng (married community civil police of the Yunnan Lake Mission): accused ofining an unfair relationship with Xiao during the marriage, and during the service, there was abuse. His wife used public office status in the community stalls under its jurisdiction to facilitate access. In addition, Zheng also repeatedly disclosed the case to Xiao, prompted a visit, and instructed Xiao to destroy the phone chat records during the disciplinary commission investigation.

Mr. Zhu was accused ofining a ten-year relationship with Mr. Xu during his marriage, until he broke up two years ago. During this period, Mr. Zhu not only seriously violated the Party Discipline Law, but was also accused of using the influence of the position of his senior officials in the Political Commission to directly intervene in the civil litigation between Mr. Xu and his ex-husband to realize the power to seek rent.

* Third, the deep torture after the “East Air bribes” case: state-owned enterprises failure to comply with regulations and alienation of power

The scandal triggered a sharp shock in the public opinion, largely because it once again conjured the public's deep anxiety about the internal management of large state-owned enterprises and the colour of power of the official site. Previously, the high level of the East Shipping Jiangsu branch of the company had exposed a wave of "sexual bribery" that shocked the country, exposed the state-owned enterprises and institutions in the power operation, resource distribution and public relations confrontation in the grey corner.

As a large state-owned backbone company, East Air has a large amount of public resources and state credit backgrounds. However, when state-owned employees are involved in decades of power transactions with local law officials, and even use the position power of senior officials of the Political Commission to intervene in private civil lawsuits, state-owned firing walls have been fictitious. Public power has been privatized, instrumentalized, and has become a small number of people seeking private benefits, covering scandals and interfering with justice.

1. Procedural justice and the rule of law: The “power asylum network” must be removed by strong supervision.

Recalling the events, from the former reporter Li Yasin to the actual exposure of political law officials and state-owned employees in the decade of power scandal, to the Nanjing police without formal procedures thousands of miles marched to Chongqing "search", then to Beijing media people were accused of "closed mouth" and search for the complainant, a cross-regional, cross-departmental "power asylum and public opinion control chain" is rare.

Legal experts pointed out that public security organs conduct cross-provincial cases with extremely strict legal red lines. No procedures cross-provincial doors, no formal process forced doors to open, seriously violate citizens' personal freedom and peace of residence, suspected of serious violation of the abuse of police power. If the local public power to cover up internal scandals to use the police power across the province "fire extinguishing", the bottom line of the rule of law will be blurred.

At present, the explosive person Li Yuan has clearly stated that he holds the complete call recording, live video, abortion medical history, WeChat transfer records and other full set of iron certificates, and urgently called for a comprehensive intervention of the national level disciplinary supervision agency, public security inspection department.This gathering of "state enterprise power scandal", "political law officials interfere with justice", "police law violation disorder" and "trans-provincial law enforcement" integrated comprehensive corruption cases, not only concerning the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of individuals, but also concerning the authority and judicial credibility of party discipline law.