People have not seen the mayor for ten years, why does the mayor of Nanning be absent from the court?

On August 25, 2026, the Nanjing Railway Transportation Intermediate Court (2026) opened a trial on the case No. 127 at the beginning of the 71st line.

On August 25, 2026, the Nanjing Railway Transportation Middle Level Court (2026) opened a trial in the case No. 127 of the 71st line of Guizhou.

At the top of the court, one side adhered to the ten years, 310.38 square meters of house "disappeared" in the compensation list of ordinary people; the other side, was the people's government of the city of Nanning that issued the decision to collect compensation.

Back in May 2014, the People's Government of Nanjing City issued the "Decision on Implementing Housing Imposition on the Guangzhou Pharmaceutical Plant Gardens Transformation and Upgrading Project", a project involving about 141 households, organized by the government of the Xinjiang Region.

During the decade, a wave of lawsuits surrounded this decision.On June 12, 2018, when the Ningbo Railway Court judged the first administrative litigation case, the deputy mayor of the People's Government of Nanjing City, Wu Yuan, appeared in court as the head of the defendant's administrative organ.

Ten years later today, the case number was replaced by the (2026) 127 of the 71st line, but the pattern in the court was reversed

the prosecutor, but only the agent of the officer, not the officer himself.

Comrade Mayor Hu Qing, the people are charged with the people's government of the city of Nanning, not with a certain law firm.

Comrade Huang has been elected Mayor of the People's Government of Nanjing City by the Fourth Session of the 15th People's Congress of Nanjing City on February 15, 2023, and has presided over the comprehensive work of the municipal government to date.

The law is written clearly and clearly: the person to appear in court is the official, deputy head

We might put the law on the table.

Article 3 Paragraph 3 of the Administrative Procedure Law states: "The person in charge of the administrative organ under appeal shall appear in court and respond to the case.If the person cannot appear in court, the corresponding personnel of the administrative organ shall be entrusted to appear."

The Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Response of Responsible Persons of Administrative Organs to the Court, implemented on July 1, 2020, further specify:

In cases involving major public interests, high social concerns, or cases where the complained administrative act involves citizens, legal persons or other organizations with major personal or property rights and interests, the people's court shall notify the person in charge of the administrative organ to appear in court to respond to the complaint.

Article 2 of this provision clearly defines the scope of the "responsible person":

The person in charge of the administrative organ, including the person in charge of the administrative organ, the person in charge of the administrative organ, the person in charge of the administrative organ, the person in charge of the administrative organ in charge of the implementation of the administrative act, and other persons in charge of the administrative organ in charge of the administrative organ.

Article 11 further emphasizes the substantive obligation of appearing in court:

The person in charge of the administrative organ to appear in court to respond to the complaint, shall give opinions on the substantive settlement of the administrative dispute.

Since the implementation of the General Office of the Guangxi Autonomous Region Government of the Guangxi Autonomous Region Administration of the Head of the Administrative Organs of the Guangxi Autonomous Region (Guangxi Government Office [2015] No. 85), from August 31, 2015 to May 2016, Guangxi has had 25 deputy mayors (including the former deputy mayors) 33 appearances in the court to respond to the "Civil Prosecutor" case, covering all 14 local municipalities.

“Why is the mayor here, why is the mayor here?”

In this case:

A 310.38 square meters of 1940 inherited mother house, in the compensation decision by the area of the 1984 184,52 square meters of the building "Zhang Li Dae", zero compensation;
the recipient of the same area 10 "do not cooperate", the total area was cut 2692.49 square meters, by 4,000 yuan / m2, the gap exceeds ten million;
the party hand held the original archive of the "Guangxi Pharmaceutical Plant Gardens House Area Survey Sheet" retained by the people's government of the city of Nanjing itself (page 91 of the first trial government evidence), white paper black recorded the existence of the two houses of the family of Huang Huang;
the head of the general project of the city of Nanjing on December 24, 2024, the final 318 judg

Important public interest?

A high level of concern?

Related to major property interests?

Is the amount of compensation higher?

The four "are" overlapping together, as required by law, is the head of the people's government of the city of Nanning

the mayor Comrade Huang, or the deputy mayor of the branch
to sit on the defendant's table.

Mayor, please keep the warmth of the people in your hearts.

We called the mayor:

The warmth of the people's masses can never be handed over by a letter of commission.

On February 8, 2026, at the seventh session of the 15th People's Congress of Nanjing, the mayor of Nanjing represented the people's government of the city and made a report on the work of the government to the congress, saying directly that the development of Nanjing during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period was extremely unusual and extremely unusual.

But the mayor, in the ten-year demolition dispute in the area of Guangxi Pharmaceutical Botanical Garden, "very unusual and extremely unusual" is the people.

The mother-in-law, Huang Guo, who was born in 1940, has long been old; his descendants lived hard for ten years in the situation of demolition of the mother-in-law, land occupation and compensation. Summer exposure to the winter cold, winds and rains, the family adhered to the original place, not for trouble, but to * preserve the most basic fairness and dignity of ordinary people.

Houses have been demolished, land has been occupied, and generations of ancestral houses have disappeared from the official compensation list. > 310.38 legal old houses have been demolished, collected, occupied, and eventually compensated to zero.

When people enter the court with the original archives retained by the people's government of the city of Nanning, what they want to see is not that a lawyer mechanically reads the "opinion of the client", but that the head of the administrative organ can face the public opinion, respond positively, and substantially resolve the dispute.

The judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court says very clearly: Where the head of the administrative organ appears in court to respond to the complaint, it shall give opinions on the substantive settlement of the administrative dispute.

This is not the form, it is the obligation of the law to give "officials", but the respect of "officials" to "people".

Mr. Huang, the trial on August 25 is over, and the people have not been waiting for you – nor have they been waiting for a deputy mayor who can really beat the board.

* The project manager has fallen, the people should not pay for corruption

The case has never been just an ordinary administrative dispute.Muhammad Khashoggi, the general manager of Guangxi Pharmaceutical Plant Gardens upgrading reform project – formerly a member of the Party Group of the Health and Health Committee of the Autonomous Region, secretary and director of the Party Committee of the Autonomous Region Pharmaceutical Plant Gardens – was sentenced to 12 years and six months in prison for bribery by the Nanjing City Hall on December 30, 2024.

But the house destroyed the people for ten years, the people for ten years, the people for ten years, the people for ten years—what did they do wrong?

They should not pay for what corrupt officials have done, nor should they see a "officer" who can solve the problem after the officials fall.

Ten years of drinking ice, only asking for a "official" word.

The August 25 trial has already begun.We hope that Mayor Huang Kong will be able to address the case after the trial:

On the "accusers not witnesses" to the public a referral —— the mayor or the deputy mayor of the branch has not appeared in court, what is the basis of the law? has the court submitted the legitimate "can not appear" grounds? — The court established the fact of the 310.38 square meter house —— the archives held by the government itself are there, without the need for self-certification of the people; — the substantive settlement of the dispute — — in accordance with the guidelines of the judgment of the Guangxi High Court (2024) No. 318 of Guangzhou, verify and separate treatment, give the people a fair question; — the mayor personally asked — — not only to question the case, but also to ask the whole Guangxi plant park district 10 households "not

Administrative organs cannot fail with historical legacy issues, cannot cover up the mistakes of facts with procedures, and even less cannot allow ordinary people to pay for official corruption and project failure for life.

Justice may be late, but it should never be absent.

“Justice should not only be found in the judgment books, but in the courts—when the ‘official’ and the ‘people’ really face to face.”

Mr. President, the warmth of the people, please put it in your hearts.

On the trial of August 25, the people didn’t wait for you.But we still look forward to – in the process of substantive settlement of the next administrative dispute, the “officials” of the people’s government of Nanjing will be able to truly face the people.

Ten years of drinking ice, cold and hot blood, it is not easy, never give up.