In accordance with article 33 bis of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Li Wingyang, who is in the second stage of the proceedings against the public service, submitted a request for the appointment of a defence lawyer to the court of second instance, as a relative and friend of Li Wing Yang, before the Intermediate People ' s Court of the city of Yi.
In the event that the court of second instance orally advised that it would not recognize his Qin Advocate and refused to issue a written legal instrument, Li and Qi Qi, as co-prosecutors, filed a complaint with the People ' s Procuratorate of the city of Yi Yi, the Department of Disciplinary Inspection of the Intermediate People ' s Court of the city of Yi Yi and the President of the court, in accordance with the law, against the presiding judge and the Full Chamber.
Briefing by Lee Shenyang
Li Wingyang, a fellow in the Pui Shui district of Shandong province, has for many years continuously responded to the problem, fought against corrupt forces and had the duty to advocate for the people. In recent years, he has become a key to the stakeholders behind the fertilizer scenes, as a result of the promotion of the investigation of the fertilizers.
On 9 September 2025, while in a hotel in Pulau, a patrol unit from Shandong Province blocked and beat by plainclothes visitors who claimed to have “demonstrations at the Grand Hotel”; The corruption forces have used the incident to create their “disruption of official duties”, and Lee was held for 148 days before being sentenced to “conviction of the offence and exemption from criminal punishment”.
Lee has appealed to the Intermediate People ' s Court of Penyi City against Yang ' s conviction.
Indictment for the supervision of trial activities
Submitted by: Lee Sunyang, male, Han ethnic group, ID No. 3728271919199371X, address: 62 Cui Jiae Jin, Yihui County, Yiyi Province, Shandong Province, telephone: 13655494031, accused of second instance in Lee Wyokyang case against the Public Service.
Complainant 2: Zhuji, male, Han, ID number 410621 1970 11715770, of origin: Dhut County, Henan Province, telephone number 13366227598, assigned to the family and friends ' defence counsel in Li-Hyang II trial.
Alleged victim: Judge in charge of the trial court case at the Intermediate People ' s Court of Pyipu, Shandong Province: Wu Honglin and other members of the Full Court
Request for complaint
I urge the people ' s procuratorates of the city of Yi, the disciplinary committee of the people ' s court of the city of Yi and the president of the intermediate court of the city of Yi Yi to exercise the legal powers of supervising the proceedings in accordance with the law:
One. (a) Monitor and rectify, in accordance with the law, the violation of the oral prohibition of the defence lawyer, who is present in the court and who refuses to produce a written decision;
- (a) Ordered the lower court to provide a formal written response, with legal reasons, on whether to grant Ziqi Qi ' s permission to act as a second-instance defence in the case;
- (b) To urge the courts to guarantee the right of the accused, Li, to be legally entrusted with defence and to have a remedy in court at the second stage of the trial, in accordance with the law, and to ensure that the case is heard fairly.
Facts and reasons
I. GENERAL CONTEXT OF THE CASE
The complainant, Lee, handed over the material to the provincial commissioner's patrol team at the Grand Hotel, was blocked and beaten by plainclothes personnel who claimed to have “packed the hotel for a party”. The full video of the entire trip is a complete factual report, which can confirm that Lee was not guilty of any offence against official duties.
However, Li was convicted of the crime by the police, prosecutors, and justice officials, Wu Yuanping and Gensuda, who ignored objective video evidence. Lee and Yang appealed the first trial judgement to the Intermediate People ' s Court of Penyi City, which was rendered by the court of second instance by Wu Honglin, in accordance with the law.
. ii. Legal appointment of a defence
According to article 33 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the relatives and friends of the accused may be entrusted by law to defend criminal cases.
At the same time, Article 37 of the Supreme People ' s Court Interpretation of the Application of the Criminal Procedure Code of the People ' s Republic of China clearly states that the People ' s Court, which is obliged to verify the identification of the defence and the power of attorney, and which does not arbitrarily deny the right of the defence to the family and friends to appear before it without cause, entrusts the accused with the role of guardian, family and friends as the defender.
In this case, the accused Lee Wingyang voluntarily entrusted his family and friends, Zi Qi Qi, to act as his second-trial defence. The legal status of the person and the procedure for the commission of the case are in accordance with the law and shall be recognized by the People ' s Court.
. The right to defence is denied in violation of the law by the court and the presiding judge.
On 17 August 2026, the accused Lee Hoang Yang received a telephone call from the Intermediate People ' s Court of the city of Riyou, Shandong Province, and was verbally informed that the Court did not grant permission to Ziwei to appear as a second-trial defence in the case.
The oral notice contained two serious violations:
One. (b) No legal grounds: the mere refusal of the court to allow the defence to appear orally, without any indication that the existence of the non-conformity of the defence, the excessive number of its defence, the conflict of interest, the inappropriateness of the defence, etc., is an unjustified violation of the right to defence;
- Refusal to produce written documents deprives the right to relief. The accused Lee and Yang expressly requested the court to issue a written decision or formal notice not to allow the defence to appear in court in order to seek judicial relief in accordance with the law, but the police and the police officers of the court in Linyi have so far ignored and refused to issue any written documents.
IV. OBSERVATION OF RESOURCES IN JULY THROUGH TRIBUNAL
The relevant provisions of the Rules of Criminal Procedure of the People ' s Procuratorate provide that the People ' s Procuratorate shall exercise legal supervision over all the activities of the people ' s courts in accordance with the law, and shall have the right to make corrective recommendations, to enforce the reformation of the law, to safeguard the fairness of the criminal procedure and the interests of the parties in the legal proceedings, in cases where the procedure established by law is violated and the procedural rights of the parties are violated in the proceedings before the courts.
Articles 30 and 43 of the Judges Act and the Law on the Organization of the People ' s Courts, as well as articles 16 and 17 of the Law on the Procedure of Corrections for Judges (Preliminary Test) provide that oversight bodies such as the Court Discipline Committee and the President of the Court shall find that the trial is illegal and shall have the power to initiate internal verification proceedings to correct errors.
In view of the foregoing, in order to uphold the dignity of the law, to remedy the violations of the law and to guarantee the right of the complainant to a fair trial, I should be grateful if you would have the necessary legal and judicial authority to establish the facts and correct the violations, and to have the results of such proceedings in writing and to have justice done so in accordance with the law.
Here you go.
People ' s Procuratorate of Penyi City
People ' s Court of Penn City
The president of the PJP, the Secretary of the PJ Party, is a ship, which is a small island.
Submitted by: Lee Wingyang
Submitted by: Ziqi Ziqi
25 August 2026
Article discussion
Verified members can discuss this report publicly and manage their own content.
Checking member sign-in status…